Literature DB >> 8212216

A long-term study of allogeneic rat hindlimb transplants immunosuppressed with RS-61443.

P Benhaim1, J P Anthony, L Y Lin, T H McCalmont, S J Mathes.   

Abstract

Although technically possible, limb allotransplantation has not been applied clinically. The skin component is especially antigenic, requiring high immunosuppressant doses with an unacceptable toxicity profile. RS-61443, an experimental mycophenolic acid ester that inhibits lymphocyte proliferation without major systemic toxicity, was tested as an immunosuppressant to prevent rejection of rat hindlimb allotransplants. Utilizing Brown-Norway donors and F344 recipients to provide a major mismatch at the MHC, midfemur orthotopic limb transfer was performed with microsurgical repair of femoral vessels and sciatic nerve. Four primary groups were studied: autografts (n = 4); untreated allografts (n = 6); allografts receiving CsA 10 mg/kg for 20 days, then twice per week (n = 6); and allografts receiving RS-61443 30 mg/kg/day (n = 6). Skin and soft tissues were biopsied to assess rejection. Autografts had indefinite limb survival, while untreated allografts had complete acute rejection within 10-12 days. Five of the six CsA rats developed delayed mild-moderate acute rejection within 6 months. In contrast, 5 of the 6 RS-61443 rats had no rejection after at least 32 weeks, while the sixth rat developed only slight rejection on skin biopsy. All animals regained full sensation and partial functional return. RS-61443 is highly effective as a primary immunosuppressant for hindlimb allotransplantation. The disturbing moderate rejection observed in CsA animals, which was absent with RS-61443, may significantly hamper function of transplanted limbs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8212216     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199310000-00026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  8 in total

1.  Upper extremity transplantation: current concepts and challenges in an emerging field.

Authors:  River M Elliott; Scott M Tintle; L Scott Levin
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2014-03

Review 2.  Composite tissue transplantation: a rapidly advancing field.

Authors:  K V Ravindra; S Wu; L Bozulic; H Xu; W C Breidenbach; S T Ildstad
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.066

3.  Hand allotransplantation.

Authors:  Gerald Brandacher; Vijay S Gorantla; W P Andrew Lee
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 4.  Preliminary risk-benefit assessment of mycophenolate mofetil in transplant rejection.

Authors:  W D Simmons; S C Rayhill; H W Sollinger
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Canine laryngeal transplantation: preliminary studies and a new heterotopic allotransplantation model.

Authors:  J P Anthony; D B Allen; P P Trabulsy; M Mahdavian; S J Mathes
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  Vascularized composite tissue allotransplantation--state of the art.

Authors:  J Rodrigo Diaz-Siso; Ericka M Bueno; Geoffroy C Sisk; Francisco M Marty; Bohdan Pomahac; Stefan G Tullius
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2013-04-14       Impact factor: 2.863

Review 7.  Split rejection in vascularized composite allotransplantation.

Authors:  Indranil Sinha; Bohdan Pomahac
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2013-10-08

8.  Evolution of the rat hind limb transplant as an experimental model of vascularized composite allotransplantation: Approaches and advantages.

Authors:  Yoram Y Fleissig; Jason E Beare; Amanda J LeBlanc; Christina L Kaufman
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2020-10-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.