Literature DB >> 24241894

Upper extremity transplantation: current concepts and challenges in an emerging field.

River M Elliott1, Scott M Tintle, L Scott Levin.   

Abstract

Loss of an isolated upper limb is an emotionally and physically devastating event that results in significant impairment. Patients who lose both upper extremities experience profound disability that affects nearly every aspect of their lives. While prosthetics and surgery can eventually provide the single limb amputee with a suitable assisting hand, limited utility, minimal haptic feedback, weight, and discomfort are persistent problems with these techniques that contribute to high rates of prosthetic rejection. Moreover, despite ongoing advances in prosthetic technology, bilateral amputees continue to experience high levels of dependency, disability, and distress. Hand and upper extremity transplantation holds several advantages over prosthetic rehabilitation. The missing limb is replaced with one of similar skin color and size. Sensibility, voluntary motor control, and proprioception are restored to a greater degree, and afford better dexterity and function than prosthetics. The main shortcomings of transplantation include the hazards of immunosuppression, the complications of rejection and its treatment, and high cost. Hand and upper limb transplantation represents the most commonly performed surgery in the growing field of Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation (VCA). As upper limb transplantation and VCA have become more widespread, several important challenges and controversies have emerged. These include: refining indications for transplantation, optimizing immunosuppression, establishing reliable criteria for monitoring, diagnosing, and treating rejection, and standardizing outcome measures. This article will summarize the historical background of hand transplantation and review the current literature and concepts surrounding it.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24241894      PMCID: PMC4094126          DOI: 10.1007/s12178-013-9191-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med        ISSN: 1935-9748


  36 in total

1.  Neuroprotective and antioxidant properties of FKBP-binding immunophilin ligands are independent on the FKBP12 pathway in human cells.

Authors:  Ken-ichi Tanaka; Naoko Fujita; Youichirou Higashi; Norio Ogawa
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2002-09-20       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Current indications for hand and face allotransplantation.

Authors:  S T Hollenbeck; D Erdmann; L S Levin
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 3.  Immunosuppression and rejection in human hand transplantation.

Authors:  S Schneeberger; V S Gorantla; T Hautz; B Pulikkottil; R Margreiter; W P A Lee
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  Prosthetic usage in major upper extremity amputations.

Authors:  T W Wright; A D Hagen; M B Wood
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.230

5.  Human composite flexor tendon allografts.

Authors:  E E Peacock; J W Madden
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1967-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Bilateral trans-humeral arm transplantation: result at 2 years.

Authors:  P C Cavadas; J Ibáñez; A Thione; L Alfaro
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  Outcomes of the first 2 American hand transplants at 8 and 6 years posttransplant.

Authors:  Warren C Breidenbach; N Ruben Gonzales; Christina L Kaufman; Martin Klapheke; Gordon R Tobin; Vijay S Gorantla
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.230

8.  The Innsbruck hand transplant program: update at 8 years after the first transplant.

Authors:  G Brandacher; M Ninkovic; H Piza-Katzer; M Gabl; H Hussl; M Rieger; M Schocke; K Egger; W Loescher; B Zelger; M Ninkovic; H Bonatti; C Boesmueller; W Mark; R Margreiter; S Schneeberger
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.066

9.  Risk acceptance in composite-tissue allotransplantation reconstructive procedures.

Authors:  Pascal Brouha; Deepak Naidu; Michael Cunningham; Allen Furr; Ramsey Majzoub; Federico V Grossi; Cedric G Francois; Claudio Maldonado; Joseph C Banis; Serge Martinez; Gustavo Perez-Abadia; Osborne Wiggins; Moshe Kon; John H Barker
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.425

10.  Early psychological aspects of severe hand injury.

Authors:  B K Grunert; C J Smith; C A Devine; B A Fehring; H S Matloub; J R Sanger; N J Yousif
Journal:  J Hand Surg Br       Date:  1988-05
View more
  4 in total

1.  From Bench to Bedside: No Need to be Nervous About Microsuturing?

Authors:  Benjamin K Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Building a Hand and Upper Extremity Transplantation Program: Lessons Learned From the First 20 Years of Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation.

Authors:  Shaun D Mendenhall; Stav Brown; Oded Ben-Amotz; Michael W Neumeister; L Scott Levin
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2018-07-31

3.  Cellular Mechanisms of Rejection of Optic and Sciatic Nerve Transplants: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Merve Yonar; Mayuko Uehara; Naima Banouni; Vivek Kasinath; Xiaofei Li; Liwei Jiang; Jing Zhao; Fengfeng Bei; Su Ryon Shin; Curtis L Cetrulo; Nasim Annabi; Reza Abdi
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2020-07-24

4.  Bionic reconstruction : Restoration of extremity function with osseointegrated and mind-controlled prostheses.

Authors:  Martin Aman; Christopher Festin; Matthias E Sporer; Clemens Gstoettner; Cosima Prahm; Konstantin D Bergmeister; Oskar C Aszmann
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 1.704

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.