Literature DB >> 8211874

Predicting patient attitudes to asthma medication.

L M Osman1, I T Russell, J A Friend, J S Legge, J G Douglas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies of patient attitudes to asthma and its control have focused on crisis action, and little attention has been paid to attitudes to regular preventive medication. It is not clear whether attitudes to regular medication are related to the degree of distress or interference with life perceived by patients as being caused by their asthma. For this reason this study examined how far dislike of medication related to dislike of other aspects of interference of asthma with daily life.
METHODS: Three hundred and ninety one patients were surveyed with a questionnaire which assessed their dislike of the interference of asthma with their physical, social, and emotional functioning, together with dislike of regular asthma medication. A response was received from 320 patients (82%).
RESULTS: Four attitude clusters were identified. Recorded in descending factor order, these were (1) dislike of asthma medication, (2) dislike of disability, (3) dislike of public life interference, and (4) dislike of social and emotional interference. The attitude clusters were not related: in particular, dislike of asthma medication could not be predicted from other dislikes, or from asthma best function ratio (ratio of best recorded peak expiratory flow rate in the previous year to predicted value), age, or sex. The most significant predictors of the patients' dislike of taking their own inhaled steroid were (1) dislike of using bronchodilator, (2) dislike of steroids generally, and (3) dislike of taking medicine every day.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient attitudes to regular asthma medication are not related to general anxieties and dislikes about asthma, nor to the potential for asthma control as judged by the best function ratio. Patients were not always consistent in their attitude to inhaled steroids in general, nor to their own named inhaled steroid in particular. A general cluster of antimedication attitudes existed, independent of whether the medication was for prophylaxis or relief. Attitudes to asthma medication may be helpful in predicting patient behaviour.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8211874      PMCID: PMC464713          DOI: 10.1136/thx.48.8.827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorax        ISSN: 0040-6376            Impact factor:   9.139


  8 in total

Review 1.  Principal component analysis and exploratory factor analysis.

Authors:  I T Joliffe; B J Morgan
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Patient characteristics relevant to effective self-management: scales for assessing attitudes of adults toward asthma.

Authors:  J M Richards; J J Dolce; R A Windsor; W C Bailey; C M Brooks; S Soong
Journal:  J Asthma       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.515

3.  Undertreatment of asthma in Dutch general practice.

Authors:  A A Kaptein; F W Dekker; K Gill; M A van der Waart
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.267

4.  Patients' perception of distress due to symptoms and effects of asthma on daily living and an investigation of possible influential factors.

Authors:  F H Quirk; P W Jones
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 6.124

5.  Patient self care in acute asthma.

Authors:  B Sibbald
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  Quality of life in patients with chronic airflow limitation.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; M Townsend; L B Berman; S O Pugsley
Journal:  Br J Dis Chest       Date:  1987-01

7.  The "Asthma Self-Efficacy Scale".

Authors:  D L Tobin; J K Wigal; J A Winder; K A Holroyd; T L Creer
Journal:  Ann Allergy       Date:  1987-10

8.  How patients manage asthma.

Authors:  J M Harding; M Modell
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1985-05
  8 in total
  11 in total

Review 1.  Rationale for once-daily therapy in asthma: compliance issues.

Authors:  M E Hyland
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Factors associated with hospital admissions and repeat emergency department visits for adults with asthma.

Authors:  R J Adams; B J Smith; R E Ruffin
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 3.  Qualitative research and evidence based medicine.

Authors:  J Green; N Britten
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-04-18

4.  Patient preferences for autonomy in decision making in asthma management.

Authors:  R J Adams; B J Smith; R E Ruffin
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.139

5.  Patients' beliefs about inhaler treatment.

Authors:  C Hand; C Bradley
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Translational behavioral research in respiratory medicine.

Authors:  Bruce G Bender; Mark S Aloia; Allison E Rankin; Frederick S Wamboldt
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Self-management behaviors in World Trade Center rescue and recovery workers with asthma.

Authors:  Belen Rojano; Erin West; Emily Goodman; Jeffrey J Weiss; Rafael E de la Hoz; Michael Crane; Laura Crowley; Denise Harrison; Steven Markowitz; Juan P Wisnivesky
Journal:  J Asthma       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 2.515

Review 8.  The patient perspective. What should a new anti-asthma agent provide?

Authors:  L Osman
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  Compliance and outcomes in patients with asthma.

Authors:  G M Cochrane
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  'It's the best of two evils': a study of patients' perceived information needs about oral steroids for asthma.

Authors:  Fiona A. Stevenson; Gwen Wallace; Peter Rivers; David Gerrett
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.