Literature DB >> 8211703

Effect of failed computed tomography-guided and endoscopic drainage on pancreatic pseudocyst management.

R Rao1, I Fedorak, R A Prinz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography and endoscopic drainage are used increasingly to treat pancreatic pseudocysts (PP). We reviewed our experience with PP to compare the outcomes of patients operated on initially (group 1) with those whose nonoperative treatment failed (computed tomography-guided or endoscopic drainage) before operation (group 2).
METHODS: The records of 70 consecutive patients operated on for PP were reviewed. The 52 patients (74%) in group 1 and 18 (26%) in group 2 were compared in terms of clinical features, laboratory test results on examination and before operation, operative findings, morbidity, mortality, and recurrence rates.
RESULTS: Before the initial drainage attempt, mean serum amylase level was higher in group 2 (542 +/- 25 vs 163 +/- 17 IU/L; p = 0.01). All other laboratory values were similar. Before operative drainage, group 2 patients had lower hemoglobin (10.7 +/- 0.5 vs 12.2 +/- 0.3 gm/dl; p < 0.05) and serum albumin level (2.7 +/- 0.2 vs 3.5 +/- 0.1 mg/dl; p < 0.01) than group 1. Morbidity was twice as frequent in group 2 (33% vs 14%). The time from initial attempt at drainage to PP resolution was longer in group 2 (104 +/- 36 vs 20 +/- 4 days; p = 0.01). However, the time from operation to resolution was similar in both groups (21 +/- 8 vs 20 +/- 4 days).
CONCLUSIONS: Failed nonoperative drainage is associated with a protracted illness and carries a risk of increased morbidity after operative intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8211703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  8 in total

Review 1.  Minimal-access approaches to complications of acute pancreatitis and benign neoplasms of the pancreas.

Authors:  T A Kellogg; K D Horvath
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Pancreatic pseudocysts: is delayed surgical intervention associated with adverse outcomes?

Authors:  Kaori Ito; Alexander Perez; Hiromichi Ito; Edward E Whang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Surgical management of complications associated with percutaneous and/or endoscopic management of pseudocyst of the pancreas.

Authors:  Satpal Singh
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  The role of pancreatic resection in the treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts.

Authors:  T J Howard; C A Lueking; E A Wiebke; H G Smith; J A Madura
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  [Endoscopic therapy of acute and chronic pancreatitis].

Authors:  W Veltzke-Schlieker; A Adler; H Abou-Rebyeh; B Wiedenmann; T Rösch
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 0.743

6.  Laparoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts.

Authors:  A Dávila-Cervantes; F Gómez; C Chan; P Bezaury; G Robles-Díaz; L F Uscanga; M F Herrera
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-07-22       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Percutaneous drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts is associated with a higher failure rate than surgical treatment in unselected patients.

Authors:  R Heider; A A Meyer; J A Galanko; K E Behrns
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Surgical therapy of pancreatic pseudocysts.

Authors:  Kevin E Behrns; Kfir Ben-David
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 3.452

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.