Literature DB >> 15791362

Laparoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts.

A Dávila-Cervantes1, F Gómez, C Chan, P Bezaury, G Robles-Díaz, L F Uscanga, M F Herrera.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs) has been used in selected cases. The aim of this study is to analyze our results with the laparoscopic technique and to compare them with those of a cohort of patients treated by open surgery during the same time period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten patients underwent laparoscopic drainage of PPs during a 7-year period [laparoscopic group (LG)]. The type of drainage was chosen according to the size and location of the PP. Demography, surgical details, results, and complications were analyzed and contrasted with those of 6 patients who underwent open drainage [open group (OG)].
RESULTS: All patients presented with mature PPs developed after a documented episode of acute pancreatitis. Mean age of the LG was 42 years (six males and four females). In the OG, mean age was 36 years (five males and one female). Etiology of the pancreatitis was alcoholic in eight patients, biliary in five, toxic in two, and associated with systemic lupus erythematous in one. Laparoscopic procedures included Roux-en-Y cystojejunostomy in four patients, extraluminal cystogastrostomy in four, and intraluminal cystogastrostomy in two. There were no conversions. In the OG, cystogastrostomy was performed in three patients and Roux-en-Y cystojejunostomy in three. One patient in the LG developed upper gastrointestinal bleeding the day after surgery that resolved uneventfully, one patient presented a postoperative abscess that required open drainage, and one patient presented a residual pseudocyst that was treated by endoscopy. Morbidity in the OG included a small bowel obstruction secondary to an internal hernia that required reoperation, pneumonia, and a residual pseudocyst that was treated conservatively in one patient each. At a median follow-up of 22 months (range, 1-72) all patients were asymptomatic with no evidence of recurrent disease by computed tomography scan.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic drainage of PPs is feasible, safe, and effective. Results are similar to those obtained using the open technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15791362     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-8204-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  15 in total

1.  Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts.

Authors:  M Dohmoto; K D Rupp
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Pancreatic pseudocyst: recommendations for operative and nonoperative management.

Authors:  K J Williams; T C Fabian
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  Percutaneous catheter drainage compared with internal drainage in the management of pancreatic pseudocyst.

Authors:  D B Adams; M C Anderson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery in patients with chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  L Fernández-Cruz; A Sáenz; E Astudillo; J P Pantoja; E Uzcátegui; S Navarro
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-03-26       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Endoscopic cystoduodenostomy of cysts of chronic calcifying pancreatitis: a report of 20 cases.

Authors:  J Sahel; C Bastid; B Pellat; P Schurgers; H Sarles
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.327

6.  Effect of failed computed tomography-guided and endoscopic drainage on pancreatic pseudocyst management.

Authors:  R Rao; I Fedorak; R A Prinz
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  The natural history of pancreatic pseudocysts: a unified concept of management.

Authors:  E L Bradley; J L Clements; A C Gonzalez
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Selected management of pancreatic pseudocysts: operative versus expectant management.

Authors:  G J Vitas; M G Sarr
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  [Laparoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocyst. 3 cases].

Authors:  G Champault; N Rizk; E Lebhar; J M Catheline; C Barrat; F Cazacu
Journal:  Ann Chir       Date:  1998

10.  The efficacy of endoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts.

Authors:  M E Smits; E A Rauws; G N Tytgat; K Huibregtse
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  9 in total

1.  Laparoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: a methodological approach.

Authors:  Numan Hamza; Basil J Ammori
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  The role of laparoendoscopic surgery in acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Theodoros E Pavlidis; Efstathios T Pavlidis; Athanasios K Sakantamis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Minimally invasive surgery of the pancreas in progress.

Authors:  Laureano Fernández-Cruz; Gleydson Cesar-Borges; Miguel Angel López-Boado; David Orduña; Salvador Navarro
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts offers similar success and complications compared to surgical treatment but with a lower cost.

Authors:  Angela Saul; Miguel Angel Ramirez Luna; Carlos Chan; Luis Uscanga; Francisco Valdovinos Andraca; Jorge Hernandez Calleros; Javier Elizondo; Felix Tellez Avila
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts in children.

Authors:  Suzanne M Yoder; Steven Rothenberg; Kuojen Tsao; Mark L Wulkan; Todd A Ponsky; Shawn D St Peter; Daniel J Ostlie; Timothy D Kane
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.878

Review 6.  [Therapy of pancreatic pseudocysts: endoscopy versus surgery].

Authors:  M Patrzyk; S Maier; A Busemann; A Glitsch; C D Heidecke
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 7.  Pancreatic pseudocysts: observation, endoscopic drainage, or resection?

Authors:  Markus M Lerch; Albrecht Stier; Ulrich Wahnschaffe; Julia Mayerle
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 5.594

8.  Endoscopic management of peri-pancreatic collections.

Authors:  David Keith Swartz; Jorge Obando
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 2.260

9.  Laparoscopic Intervention to Pancreatic Pseudocyst Confers Short-Term Benefits: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yulin Guo; Shun Hu; Shuo Wang; Ang Li; Feng Cao; Fei Li
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 1.112

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.