Literature DB >> 8210822

A Bayesian strategy for screening cancer treatments prior to phase II clinical evaluation.

P F Thall1, E H Estey.   

Abstract

We address the problem of selecting a treatment for phase II evaluation when several candidate treatments emerging from phase I testing are available. A pre-phase II Bayesian selection design which randomizes patients among treatments is proposed. The patient group in the trial has prognosis more favourable than that of phase I patients but less favourable than the target group of the subsequent phase II trial. The patient response rate distribution in each treatment arm is continually updated during the trial for comparison with early termination cutoffs, and the best final treatment must satisfy a minimal posterior efficacy criterion. The primary aim is to replace the usual informal treatment selection process with a fair comparison formally based on a combination of prior opinion and clinical data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8210822     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780121303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  6 in total

Review 1.  Stopping rules for phase II studies.

Authors:  N Stallard; J Whitehead; S Todd; A Whitehead
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Do commonly used clinical trial designs reflect clinical reality?

Authors:  Elihu Estey
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  Phase IIB trial of oral Midostaurin (PKC412), the FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 receptor (FLT3) and multi-targeted kinase inhibitor, in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome with either wild-type or mutated FLT3.

Authors:  Thomas Fischer; Richard M Stone; Daniel J Deangelo; Ilene Galinsky; Elihu Estey; Carlo Lanza; Edward Fox; Gerhard Ehninger; Eric J Feldman; Gary J Schiller; Virginia M Klimek; Stephen D Nimer; D Gary Gilliland; Catherine Dutreix; Alice Huntsman-Labed; Jodi Virkus; Francis J Giles
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Combination of topotecan with cytarabine or etoposide in patients with refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: results of a randomized phase I/II study.

Authors:  N Vey; H Kantarjian; M Beran; S O'Brien; J Cortes; C Koller; E Estey
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.850

5.  Bayesian clinical trials at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center: An update.

Authors:  Rebecca S Slack Tidwell; S Andrew Peng; Minxing Chen; Diane D Liu; Ying Yuan; J Jack Lee
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 6.  A Review of Perspectives on the Use of Randomization in Phase II Oncology Trials.

Authors:  Michael J Grayling; Munyaradzi Dimairo; Adrian P Mander; Thomas F Jaki
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 13.506

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.