Literature DB >> 11422011

Stopping rules for phase II studies.

N Stallard1, J Whitehead, S Todd, A Whitehead.   

Abstract

This paper, the second in a series of three papers concerned with the statistical aspects of interim analyses in clinical trials, is concerned with stopping rules in phase II clinical trials. Phase II trials are generally small-scale studies, and may include one or more experimental treatments with or without a control. A common feature is that the results primarily determine the course of further clinical evaluation of a treatment rather than providing definitive evidence of treatment efficacy. This means that there is more flexibility available in the design and analysis of such studies than in phase III trials. This has led to a range of different approaches being taken to the statistical design of stopping rules for such trials. This paper briefly describes and compares the different approaches. In most cases the stopping rules can be described and implemented easily without knowledge of the detailed statistical and computational methods used to obtain the rules.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11422011      PMCID: PMC2014484          DOI: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01381.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  20 in total

1.  Decision theoretic designs for phase II clinical trials with multiple outcomes.

Authors:  N Stallard; P F Thall; J Whitehead
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Sequential designs for phase III clinical trials incorporating treatment selection.

Authors:  Nigel Stallard; Susan Todd
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  The determinatio of the number of patients required in a preliminary and a follow-up trial of a new chemotherapeutic agent.

Authors:  E A GEHAN
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1961-04

4.  One-sided sequential stopping boundaries for clinical trials: a decision-theoretic approach.

Authors:  D A Berry; C H Ho
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  A two-stage design for choosing among several experimental treatments and a control in clinical trials.

Authors:  P F Thall; R Simon; S S Ellenberg
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  R Simon
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1989-03

7.  Sample sizes for phase II and phase III clinical trials: an integrated approach.

Authors:  J Whitehead
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Designing phase II studies in the context of a programme of clinical research.

Authors:  J Whitehead
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  One-sample multiple testing procedure for phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  T R Fleming
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Statistical considerations for pilot studies.

Authors:  D Schoenfeld
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Learning from previous responses in phase I dose-escalation studies.

Authors:  J Whitehead; Y Zhou; N Stallard; S Todd; A Whitehead
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  An Overview of Phase 2 Clinical Trial Designs.

Authors:  Pedro A Torres-Saavedra; Kathryn A Winter
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Integrating pharmacists into aged care facilities to improve the quality use of medicine (PiRACF Study): protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sam Kosari; Jane Koerner; Mark Naunton; Gregory M Peterson; Ibrahim Haider; Emily Lancsar; David Wright; Theo Niyonsenga; Rachel Davey
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Inhaled PGE1 in neonates with hypoxemic respiratory failure: two pilot feasibility randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Beena G Sood; Martin Keszler; Meena Garg; Jonathan M Klein; Robin Ohls; Namasivayam Ambalavanan; C Michael Cotten; Monica Malian; Pablo J Sanchez; Satyan Lakshminrusimha; Leif D Nelin; Krisa P Van Meurs; Rebecca Bara; Shampa Saha; Abhik Das; Dennis Wallace; Rosemary D Higgins; Seetha Shankaran
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Changing the Paradigm for the Treatment and Development of New Therapies for FSGS.

Authors:  Cathie Spino; Jordan S Jahnke; David T Selewski; Susan Massengill; Jonathan Troost; Debbie S Gipson
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.418

6.  Phase II, multi-center, open-label, single-arm clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of Mycophenolate Mofetil in patients with high-grade locally advanced or metastatic osteosarcoma (ESMMO): rationale and design of the ESMMO trial.

Authors:  Nut Koonrungsesomboon; Nuttapong Ngamphaiboon; Natavudh Townamchai; Pimpisa Teeyakasem; Chaiyut Charoentum; Pimlak Charoenkwan; Rungrote Natesirinilkul; Lalita Sathitsamitphong; Touch Ativitavas; Parunya Chaiyawat; Jeerawan Klangjorhor; Suradej Hongeng; Dumnoensun Pruksakorn
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Do single-arm trials have a role in drug development plans incorporating randomised trials?

Authors:  Michael J Grayling; Adrian P Mander
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 1.894

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.