Literature DB >> 8210815

The continual reassessment method in cancer phase I clinical trials: a simulation study.

S Chevret1.   

Abstract

In cancer studies, the aim of phase I clinical trials is to identify an appropriate dose for experimentation in phase II and III studies. The continual reassessment method (CRM) has been developed recently and presented as the method of choice in the design and analysis of such phase I studies. However, to implement the method, some methodological and practical considerations must be addressed. This paper examines, through a simulation study, the sensitivity of CRM both to the initial modelling of the dose-toxicity relationship and the prior. It appears that the performance of CRM can be improved by using vague priors and initial tuning of the model to allow flexibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8210815     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780121201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  16 in total

Review 1.  Modelling and simulation in the development and use of anti-cancer agents: an underused tool?

Authors:  Ferdinand Rombout; Leon Aarons; Mats Karlsson; Anthony Man; France Mentré; Peter Nygren; Amy Racine; Hans Schaefer; Jean-Louis Steimer; Iñaki Troconiz; Achiel van Peer
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  Calibration of prior variance in the Bayesian continual reassessment method.

Authors:  Shing M Lee; Ying Kuen Cheung
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Continual Reassessment and Related Dose-Finding Designs.

Authors:  John O'Quigley; Mark Conaway
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.901

4.  Proportional odds model for dose-finding clinical trial designs with ordinal toxicity grading.

Authors:  Emily M Van Meter; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Dipankar Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Practical modifications to the time-to-event continual reassessment method for phase I cancer trials with fast patient accrual and late-onset toxicities.

Authors:  Mei-Yin C Polley
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  High-dose lovastatin for acute ischemic stroke: results of the phase I dose escalation neuroprotection with statin therapy for acute recovery trial (NeuSTART).

Authors:  Mitchell S V Elkind; Ralph L Sacco; Robert B Macarthur; Ellinor Peerschke; Greg Neils; Howard Andrews; Joshua Stillman; Tania Corporan; Dana Leifer; Rui Liu; Ken Cheung
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 2.762

7.  The Neuroprotection with Statin Therapy for Acute Recovery Trial (NeuSTART): an adaptive design phase I dose-escalation study of high-dose lovastatin in acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Mitchell S V Elkind; Ralph L Sacco; Robert B MacArthur; Daniel J Fink; Ellinor Peerschke; Howard Andrews; Greg Neils; Josh Stillman; Tania Corporan; Dana Leifer; Ken Cheung
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.266

8.  pocrm: an R-package for phase I trials of combinations of agents.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Nikole Varhegyi
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Adaptive prior variance calibration in the Bayesian continual reassessment method.

Authors:  Jin Zhang; Thomas M Braun; Jeremy M G Taylor
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Performance of two-stage continual reassessment method relative to an optimal benchmark.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Mark R Conaway; John O'Quigley
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.486

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.