S T Lawless1. 1. Department of Pediatrics and Anesthesia, Alfred I. duPont Institute, Wilmington, DE 19899.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the predictive value of patient monitoring alarms as a warning system in a pediatric intensive care unit (ICU). DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Pediatric ICU of a university affiliated children's hospital. INTERVENTIONS: During a 7-day period, ICU staff were asked to record the type and number of alarm soundings. Alarms were recorded as false, significant (resulted in change in therapy), or induced (by staff manipulations; not significant). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sixty-six percent of nursing shifts (928 patient hours of care) responded. There were 2,176 alarms soundings: 1,481 (68%) false, 119 (5.5%) significant, and 576 (26.5%) induced. Alarm origins were: 44% pulse oximeter, 1% end-tidal PCO2, 31% ventilator, and 24% electrocardiograph (EKG). The positive predictive value of alarms were: 7% pulse oximeter, 16% end-tidal PCO2, 3% ventilator, and 5% EKG. The negative predictive value of all alarms were > 97%. More alarms sounded during the 7:00 am to 3:00 pm shift than during the 3:00 pm to 11:00 pm or 11:00 pm to 7:00 am shifts (167 +/- 19 vs. 64 +/- 39 vs. 75 +/- 43, p < .05, respectively). When corrected for number of patients/shift, the occurrence of soundings differed only between day and night (11.4 +/- 1.5/patient/shift vs. 6.1 +/- 1.0, p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Over 94% of alarm soundings in a pediatric ICU may not be clinically important. Present monitoring systems are poor predictors of untoward events.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the predictive value of patient monitoring alarms as a warning system in a pediatric intensive care unit (ICU). DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Pediatric ICU of a university affiliated children's hospital. INTERVENTIONS: During a 7-day period, ICU staff were asked to record the type and number of alarm soundings. Alarms were recorded as false, significant (resulted in change in therapy), or induced (by staff manipulations; not significant). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sixty-six percent of nursing shifts (928 patient hours of care) responded. There were 2,176 alarms soundings: 1,481 (68%) false, 119 (5.5%) significant, and 576 (26.5%) induced. Alarm origins were: 44% pulse oximeter, 1% end-tidal PCO2, 31% ventilator, and 24% electrocardiograph (EKG). The positive predictive value of alarms were: 7% pulse oximeter, 16% end-tidal PCO2, 3% ventilator, and 5% EKG. The negative predictive value of all alarms were > 97%. More alarms sounded during the 7:00 am to 3:00 pm shift than during the 3:00 pm to 11:00 pm or 11:00 pm to 7:00 am shifts (167 +/- 19 vs. 64 +/- 39 vs. 75 +/- 43, p < .05, respectively). When corrected for number of patients/shift, the occurrence of soundings differed only between day and night (11.4 +/- 1.5/patient/shift vs. 6.1 +/- 1.0, p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Over 94% of alarm soundings in a pediatric ICU may not be clinically important. Present monitoring systems are poor predictors of untoward events.
Authors: Felix Schmid; Matthias S Goepfert; Frank Franz; David Laule; Beate Reiter; Alwin E Goetz; Daniel A Reuter Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2015-11-30 Impact factor: 2.502
Authors: Christopher P Bonafide; Richard Lin; Miriam Zander; Christian Sarkis Graham; Christine W Paine; Whitney Rock; Andrew Rich; Kathryn E Roberts; Margaret Fortino; Vinay M Nadkarni; A Russell Localio; Ron Keren Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2015-04-15 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: S Siebig; S Kuhls; U Gather; M Imhoff; T Müller; T Bein; B Trabold; S Bele; C E Wrede Journal: Anaesthesist Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 1.041
Authors: Luisa Flohr; Shaylene Beaudry; K Taneille Johnson; Nicholas West; Catherine M Burns; J Mark Ansermino; Guy A Dumont; David Wensley; Peter Skippen; Matthias Gorges Journal: IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med Date: 2018-03-05 Impact factor: 3.316
Authors: C Oberli; J Urzua; C Saez; M Guarini; A Ciprianio; B Garayar; G Lema; R Canessa; C Sacco; M Irarrazaval Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 2.502