Literature DB >> 8204454

Reading versus comprehension: implications for patient education and consent in an outpatient oncology clinic.

S J Jubelirer1, J C Linton, S M Magnetti.   

Abstract

Written educational materials and consent forms are often given to patients with little regard for their ability to read them. Nationwide sampling and data from the 1990 census suggest that 10% of U.S. adults are functionally illiterate. In this study, 100 adult patients (64 female, 36 male) seen consecutively in an oncology clinic were tested for reading vocabulary (RD-VOCAB) and reading comprehension (RD-COMP) using the Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational Battery. The mean grade levels of education (last grade completed), reading vocabulary, and reading comprehension of all participants were 12.5, 11.3, and 10.5, respectively. The discrepancy between the grade level of education and RD-COMP varied by age, the largest discrepancies being found in the 30-39 (three grades) and 60-69 (2 1/2 grades) age groups. After controlling for educational level, it was found that the mean grade level of RD-COMP was statistically lower than educational level. Statistically assuming all subjects to have completed high school, the mean levels of RD-COMP ranged from ninth grade in the 30-39 age group to twelfth grade in the 40-49 age group. This study underscores the fact that the health professional cannot assume that a patient who has completed a certain grade level in school can read at the corresponding level. Consent forms and other health education materials should be written at least three grade levels lower than the average educational level of the target population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8204454     DOI: 10.1080/08858199409528261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  6 in total

Review 1.  Promoting health literacy.

Authors:  Alexa T McCray
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  The prevalence of limited health literacy.

Authors:  Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Ruth M Parker; Julie A Gazmararian; Lynn T Nielsen-Bohlman; Rima R Rudd
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  The use of multimedia in the informed consent process.

Authors:  H B Jimison; P P Sher; R Appleyard; Y LeVernois
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Addressing low literacy and health literacy in clinical oncology practice.

Authors:  Sofia F Garcia; Elizabeth A Hahn; Elizabeth A Jacobs
Journal:  J Support Oncol       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr

5.  Readability and Comprehension of Printed Patient Education Materials.

Authors:  Pálma Szabó; Éva Bíró; Karolina Kósa
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-11-30

6.  Clinical evaluation, imaging studies, indications for cytologic study and preprocedural requirements for duct brushing studies and pancreatic fine-needle aspiration: The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology Guidelines.

Authors:  Douglas Adler; C Max Schmidt; Mohammad Al-Haddad; James S Barthel; Britt-Marie Ljung; Nipun B Merchant; Joseph Romagnuolo; Akram M Shaaban; Diane Simeone; Martha Bishop Pitman; Lester J Layfield
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 2.091

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.