PURPOSE: To assess the value of fat-suppressed contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging was performed in 51 cases of suspected osteomyelitis. Nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fat-suppressed MR images were also obtained. Three-phase bone scan results were available for 30 cases. Complicating clinical factors, including chronic osteomyelitis (n = 26), postoperative state (n = 17), and neuropathic disease of the foot (n = 5), were identified in 73% of cases. RESULTS: In the diagnosis of osteomyelitis, scintigraphy demonstrated a sensitivity of 61% and specificity of 33%. For nonenhanced MR imaging, sensitivity was 79% and specificity was 53%. For fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced imaging, sensitivity was 88% and specificity was 93%. CONCLUSION: In diagnosing osteomyelitis in patients with complicating clinical factors, fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced MR imaging was significantly more sensitive than scintigraphy (P = .04) and significantly more specific than nonenhanced MR imaging (P = .02) or scintigraphy (P = .008).
PURPOSE: To assess the value of fat-suppressed contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging was performed in 51 cases of suspected osteomyelitis. Nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fat-suppressed MR images were also obtained. Three-phase bone scan results were available for 30 cases. Complicating clinical factors, including chronic osteomyelitis (n = 26), postoperative state (n = 17), and neuropathic disease of the foot (n = 5), were identified in 73% of cases. RESULTS: In the diagnosis of osteomyelitis, scintigraphy demonstrated a sensitivity of 61% and specificity of 33%. For nonenhanced MR imaging, sensitivity was 79% and specificity was 53%. For fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced imaging, sensitivity was 88% and specificity was 93%. CONCLUSION: In diagnosing osteomyelitis in patients with complicating clinical factors, fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced MR imaging was significantly more sensitive than scintigraphy (P = .04) and significantly more specific than nonenhanced MR imaging (P = .02) or scintigraphy (P = .008).
Authors: Nogah Shabshin; Mark E Schweitzer; William B Morrison; John A Carrino; Marc S Keller; Leslie E Grissom Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2006-04-25