Literature DB >> 8202469

A method for alpha-helical integral membrane protein fold prediction.

W R Taylor1, D T Jones, N M Green.   

Abstract

Integral membrane proteins (of the alpha-helical class) are of central importance in a wide variety of vital cellular functions. Despite considerable effort on methods to predict the location of the helices, little attention has been directed toward developing an automatic method to pack the helices together. In principle, the prediction of membrane proteins should be easier than the prediction of globular proteins: there is only one type of secondary structure and all helices pack with a common alignment across the membrane. This allows all possible structures to be represented on a simple lattice and exhaustively enumerated. Prediction success lies not in generating many possible folds but in recognizing which corresponds to the native. Our evaluation of each fold is based on how well the exposed surface predicted from a multiple sequence alignment fits its allocated position. Just as exposure to solvent in globular proteins can be predicted from sequence variation, so exposure to lipid can be recognized by variable-hydrophobic (variphobic) positions. Application to both bacteriorhodopsin and the eukaryotic rhodopsin/opsin families revealed that the angular size of the lipid-exposed faces must be predicted accurately to allow selection of the correct fold. With the inherent uncertainties in helix prediction and parameter choice, this accuracy could not be guaranteed but the correct fold was typically found in the top six candidates. Our method provides the first completely automatic method that can proceed from a scan of the protein sequence databanks to a predicted three-dimensional structure with no intervention required from the investigator. Within the limited domain of the seven helix bundle proteins, a good chance can be given of selecting the correct structure. However, the limited number of sequences available with a corresponding known structure makes further characterization of the method difficult.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8202469     DOI: 10.1002/prot.340180309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  30 in total

1.  Helix-bundle membrane protein fold templates.

Authors:  J U Bowie
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 2.  Structural organization of G-protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  A L Lomize; I D Pogozheva; H I Mosberg
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Modeling and docking the endothelin G-protein-coupled receptor.

Authors:  A J Orry; B A Wallace
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  A sequence and structural study of transmembrane helices.

Authors:  R P Bywater; D Thomas; G Vriend
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  The variable and conserved interfaces of modeled olfactory receptor proteins.

Authors:  Y Pilpel; D Lancet
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  An automatic method for predicting transmembrane protein structures using cryo-EM and evolutionary data.

Authors:  Sarel J Fleishman; Susan Harrington; Richard A Friesner; Barry Honig; Nir Ben-Tal
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-08-31       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Accurate de novo structure prediction of large transmembrane protein domains using fragment-assembly and correlated mutation analysis.

Authors:  Timothy Nugent; David T Jones
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Multipass membrane protein structure prediction using Rosetta.

Authors:  Vladimir Yarov-Yarovoy; Jack Schonbrun; David Baker
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-03-01

Review 9.  Towards genome-scale structure prediction for transmembrane proteins.

Authors:  Naama Hurwitz; Marialuisa Pellegrini-Calace; David T Jones
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Topology prediction for helical transmembrane proteins at 86% accuracy.

Authors:  B Rost; P Fariselli; R Casadio
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 6.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.