Literature DB >> 8202094

A population-based study of the risk of recurrence of birth defects.

R T Lie1, A J Wilcox, R Skjaerven.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Certain birth defects are known to recur in families, but most estimates of the risk of recurrence have come from clinic-based studies. In this study we estimated the risk of recurrent birth defects using a population-based registry.
METHODS: The study was based on the records of the first and second infants delivered by 371,933 women from 1967 through 1989. The records are maintained by the Medical Birth Registry of Norway. For the 9192 women whose first infant had a birth defect, we determined the relative risk of similar and dissimilar defects in the second infant. The reference population was women whose first infant had no defect.
RESULTS: Among first infants, 2.5 percent had a birth defect. The mothers of affected first infants were 2.4 times as likely as other women to have second infants with any registered defect. This increased risk was due primarily to an increased (7.6 times higher) risk of the same defect in the second infant as in the first (95 percent confidence interval, 6.5 to 8.8) and secondarily to a slightly increased (1.5 times higher) risk of a different defect in the second infant (95 percent confidence interval, 1.3 to 1.7). Among the women who lived in the same municipality during both pregnancies, the relative risk of having a second infant with the same defect was 11.6, as compared with 5.1 among the women who moved to another municipality after the birth of their first infant (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Among women whose first infant has a birth defect, the risk of the same defect in the second infant is substantially increased and the risk of a different defect in the second infant is slightly increased. Environment plays a strong part in repeated defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8202094     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199407073310101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  20 in total

1.  The dilemma of antenatal HIV testing: what goes on in the European Community?

Authors:  C N Hudson; A Bergenström; E Bell; E McCann; L Sherr
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Risk of birth defects by parental occupational exposure to 50 Hz electromagnetic fields: a population based study.

Authors:  K G Blaasaas; T Tynes; A Irgens; R T Lie
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Are epidemiological approaches suitable to study risk/preventive factors for human birth defects?

Authors:  Sonia Hernandez-Diaz; Anna Sara Oberg
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2015-03

4.  Familial risks of oral clefts.

Authors:  Melissa Lees
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-02-04

5.  Unsuspected HIV infection presenting in first year of life.

Authors:  J A Evans; S C Marriage; M D Walters; M Levin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-05-13

6.  Clinical guidelines in the independent health care sector.

Authors:  G Fairfield; R Williams
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-06-22

7.  Fetal and maternal contributions to risk of pre-eclampsia: population based study.

Authors:  R T Lie; S Rasmussen; H Brunborg; H K Gjessing; E Lie-Nielsen; L M Irgens
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-05-02

8.  The number needed to treat: a clinically useful nomogram in its proper context.

Authors:  G Chatellier; E Zapletal; D Lemaitre; J Menard; P Degoulet
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-02-17

Review 9.  Strong Association of C677T Polymorphism of Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase Gene With Nosyndromic Cleft Lip/Palate (nsCL/P).

Authors:  Vandana Rai
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2017-07-07

10.  Women's Reproductive History Before the Diagnosis of Incident Endometriosis.

Authors:  Germaine M Buck Louis; Uba Backonja; Karen C Schliep; Liping Sun; C Matthew Peterson; Zhen Chen
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.