Literature DB >> 11850551

Risk of birth defects by parental occupational exposure to 50 Hz electromagnetic fields: a population based study.

K G Blaasaas1, T Tynes, A Irgens, R T Lie.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To study the risk of birth defects by parental occupational exposure to 50 Hz electromagnetic fields.
METHODS: The Medical Birth Registry of Norway was linked with census data on parental occupation. An expert panel constructed a job exposure matrix of parental occupational exposure to 50 Hz magnetic fields. Exposure to magnetic fields was estimated by combining branch and occupation into one of three exposure levels: <4 hours, 4-24 hours, and >24 hours/week above approximately 0.1 mu T. Risks of 24 categories of birth defects were compared across exposure levels. Out of all 1.6 million births in Norway in the period 1967-95, 836,475 and 1,290,298 births had information on maternal and paternal exposure, respectively. Analyses were based on tests for trend and were adjusted for parents' educational level, place of birth, maternal age, and year of birth.
RESULTS: The total risk of birth defects was not associated with parental exposure. Maternal exposure was associated with increased risks of spina bifida (p=0.04) and clubfoot (p=0.04). A negative association was found for isolated cleft palate (p=0.01). Paternal exposure was associated with increased risks of anencephaly (p=0.01) and a category of "other defects" (p=0.02).
CONCLUSION: The present study gives an indication of an association between selected disorders of the central nervous system and parental exposure to 50 Hz magnetic fields. Given the crude exposure assessment, lack of comparable studies, and the high number of outcomes considered, the results should be interpreted with caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11850551      PMCID: PMC1740256          DOI: 10.1136/oem.59.2.92

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  21 in total

1.  Is job title an adequate surrogate to measure magnetic field exposure?

Authors:  B Floderus
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Exposure of children to residential magnetic fields in Norway: is proximity to power lines an adequate predictor of exposure?

Authors:  A I Vistnes; G B Ramberg; L R Bjørnevik; T Tynes; T Haldorsen
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.010

3.  Electromagnetic fields and cancer in children residing near Norwegian high-voltage power lines.

Authors:  T Tynes; T Haldorsen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-02-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Effects of pulsed electromagnetic field on growth and differentiation of embryonal carcinoma cells.

Authors:  T Akamine; H Muramatsu; H Hamada; T Sakou
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 6.384

5.  Pulse shape of magnetic fields influences chick embryogenesis.

Authors:  A Ubeda; J Leal; M A Trillo; M A Jimenez; J M Delgado
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Effect of magnetic field on chick morphogenesis.

Authors:  M V Joshi; M Z Khan; P S Damle
Journal:  Differentiation       Date:  1978-01-13       Impact factor: 3.880

7.  Effects of pulsing electromagnetic fields on the prenatal and postnatal development in mice and rats: in vivo and in vitro studies.

Authors:  I Zusman; P Yaffe; H Pinus; A Ornoy
Journal:  Teratology       Date:  1990-08

8.  Paternal work in the power industry: effects on children at delivery.

Authors:  S Törnqvist
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.162

9.  Embryological changes induced by weak, extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  J M Delgado; J Leal; J L Monteagudo; M G Gracia
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 2.610

10.  Occupationally related magnetic field exposure and male subfertility.

Authors:  L S Lundsberg; M B Bracken; K Belanger
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  7 in total

1.  Effects of paternal electromagnetic pulse exposure on the reproductive endocrine function of male offspring: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ming-Juan Yang; Hai-Yang Lang; Xia Miao; Hai-Qiang Liu; Yan-Jun Zhang; Ya-Feng Wang; Yong-Bin Chen; Jun-Ye Liu; Li-Hua Zeng; Guo-Zhen Guo
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 3.524

2.  Residential and occupational exposure to 50 Hz magnetic fields and malignant melanoma: a population based study.

Authors:  T Tynes; L Klaeboe; T Haldorsen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  High prevalence of gastroschisis in Brazilian triple side border: A socioenvironmental spatial analysis.

Authors:  Suzana de Souza; Oscar Kenji Nihei; Cezar Rangel Pestana
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Exposure to Power-Frequency Magnetic Fields and the Risk of Infertility and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: Update on the Human Evidence and Recommendations for Future Study Designs.

Authors:  Ryan C Lewis; Russ Hauser; Andrew D Maynard; Richard L Neitzel; Lu Wang; Robert Kavet; John D Meeker
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 6.393

5.  Medication use in pregnancy in relation to the risk of isolated clubfoot in offspring.

Authors:  Martha M Werler; Mahsa M Yazdy; James R Kasser; Susan T Mahan; Robert E Meyer; Marlene Anderka; Charlotte M Druschel; Allen A Mitchell
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Major birth defects in the Brazilian side of the triple border: a population-based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Suzana de Souza; Fernando Kenji Nampo; Cezar Rangel Pestana
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2020-06-30

7.  Study of congenital malformations among the progeny of the personnel of an interforce military shooting range in Sardinia, Italy.

Authors:  Giannina Satta; Michela Ursi; Claudia Pili; Marcello Campagna; Pierluigi Cocco
Journal:  Med Lav       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 1.275

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.