PURPOSE: To analyze the French experience of chemotherapeutic preparation before human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in children with acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The data base used for this study was a French BMT registry for childhood AML. Twenty-three children were conditioned with busulfan and 120 mg/kg cyclophosphamide (Bu-Cy 120 group). Nineteen received busulfan and 200 mg/kg cyclophosphamide (Bu-Cy200 group). During the same time period, 32 patients were prepared with total-body irradiation (TBI group) most often in combination with 120 mg/kg of cyclophosphamide. RESULTS: The probability of relapse was 54%, 13%, and 10% for the Bu-Cy120, Bu-Cy200, and TBI groups, respectively (P < .05 in the univariate analysis, log-rank test, 2 df). In the multivariate analysis, a conditioning regimen with Bu-Cy120 was significantly associated with a higher risk of relapse (P = .02; relative risk, 3.62). The probability of transplant-related mortality (TRM) was 0% for Bu-Cy120, 5% for Bu-Cy200, and 10% for TBI. Kaplan-Meier estimations of event-free survival (EFS) were 46% +/- 24%, 82% +/- 18%, and 80% +/- 14%, respectively, for the three groups, with median follow-up durations of 28 months (range, 3 to 78), 31 months (4 to 68), and 48 months (2 to 73). In the multivariate analysis, two factors adversely affected EFS: a conditioning regimen with Bu-Cy120 (P = .07) and a long interval from diagnosis to BMT (> or = 120 days, P = .08). CONCLUSION: Bu-Cy120 is a well-tolerated preparation, but results in a high risk of relapse for children with AML in first CR. This high risk of relapse is not observed when the dose of cyclophosphamide is increased to 200 mg/kg.
PURPOSE: To analyze the French experience of chemotherapeutic preparation before human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in children with acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The data base used for this study was a French BMT registry for childhood AML. Twenty-three children were conditioned with busulfan and 120 mg/kg cyclophosphamide (Bu-Cy 120 group). Nineteen received busulfan and 200 mg/kg cyclophosphamide (Bu-Cy200 group). During the same time period, 32 patients were prepared with total-body irradiation (TBI group) most often in combination with 120 mg/kg of cyclophosphamide. RESULTS: The probability of relapse was 54%, 13%, and 10% for the Bu-Cy120, Bu-Cy200, and TBI groups, respectively (P < .05 in the univariate analysis, log-rank test, 2 df). In the multivariate analysis, a conditioning regimen with Bu-Cy120 was significantly associated with a higher risk of relapse (P = .02; relative risk, 3.62). The probability of transplant-related mortality (TRM) was 0% for Bu-Cy120, 5% for Bu-Cy200, and 10% for TBI. Kaplan-Meier estimations of event-free survival (EFS) were 46% +/- 24%, 82% +/- 18%, and 80% +/- 14%, respectively, for the three groups, with median follow-up durations of 28 months (range, 3 to 78), 31 months (4 to 68), and 48 months (2 to 73). In the multivariate analysis, two factors adversely affected EFS: a conditioning regimen with Bu-Cy120 (P = .07) and a long interval from diagnosis to BMT (> or = 120 days, P = .08). CONCLUSION:Bu-Cy120 is a well-tolerated preparation, but results in a high risk of relapse for children with AML in first CR. This high risk of relapse is not observed when the dose of cyclophosphamide is increased to 200 mg/kg.
Authors: F Locatelli; R Masetti; R Rondelli; M Zecca; F Fagioli; A Rovelli; C Messina; E Lanino; A Bertaina; C Favre; G Giorgiani; M Ripaldi; O Ziino; G Palumbo; M Pillon; A Pession; S Rutella; A Prete Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2014-11-10 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: E de Berranger; A Cousien; A Petit; R Peffault de Latour; C Galambrun; Y Bertrand; A Salmon; F Rialland; P-S Rohrlich; J-P Vannier; P Lutz; K Yakouben; A Duhamel; B Bruno; G Michel; J-H Dalle Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2013-12-09 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Imke H Bartelink; Jaap J Boelens; Robbert G M Bredius; Antoine C G Egberts; Chenguang Wang; Marc B Bierings; Peter J Shaw; Christa E Nath; George Hempel; Juliette Zwaveling; Meindert Danhof; Catherijne A J Knibbe Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2012-05-01 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Edward A Copelan; Betty K Hamilton; Belinda Avalos; Kwang Woo Ahn; Brian J Bolwell; Xiaochun Zhu; Mahmoud Aljurf; Koen van Besien; Christopher Bredeson; Jean-Yves Cahn; Luciano J Costa; Marcos de Lima; Robert Peter Gale; Gregory A Hale; Joerg Halter; Mehdi Hamadani; Yoshihiro Inamoto; Rammurti T Kamble; Mark R Litzow; Alison W Loren; David I Marks; Eduardo Olavarria; Vivek Roy; Mitchell Sabloff; Bipin N Savani; Matthew Seftel; Harry C Schouten; Celalettin Ustun; Edmund K Waller; Daniel J Weisdorf; Baldeep Wirk; Mary M Horowitz; Mukta Arora; Jeff Szer; Jorge Cortes; Matt E Kalaycio; Richard T Maziarz; Wael Saber Journal: Blood Date: 2013-09-24 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: T E Druley; R Hayashi; D B Mansur; Q Jean Zhang; Y Barnes; K Trinkaus; S Witty; T Thomas; E E Klein; J F DiPersio; D Adkins; S Shenoy Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2008-11-17 Impact factor: 5.483