Literature DB >> 8201372

Cisplatin, vinblastine, and hydrazine sulfate in advanced, non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized placebo-controlled, double-blind phase III study of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

M P Kosty1, S B Fleishman, J E Herndon, K Coughlin, A B Kornblith, A Scalzo, J C Morris, J Mortimer, M R Green.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the chemotherapy regimen of cisplatin, vinblastine, and hydrazine sulfate administered to patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind phase III study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 25, 1989 and February 1, 1991, 291 patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC and performance status 0 or 1 were randomized to receive cisplatin 100 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) every 28 days, vinblastine 5 mg/m2 IV per week times five, then every 2 weeks; and either hydrazine sulfate 60 mg three times per day orally or placebo. The concurrent use of corticosteroids, medroxyprogesterone, or other appetite stimulants was not permitted. Treatment groups were comparable for known prognostic variables. The primary end point of this study was survival; however, the influence of hydrazine sulfate on nutritional status, performance status, and quality of life was also assessed.
RESULTS: Analysis of 266 eligible patients showed a median survival duration of 7.78 months for the hydrazine sulfate-treated group compared with 7.70 months for the placebo-treated group (P = .65, log-rank). Objective response rates were similar for the two groups, with 4% complete responses, 20% partial responses, and 2% regressions in those treated with hydrazine sulfate; 3% complete responses, 23% partial responses, and 2% regressions in those who received placebo. The major toxicity was severe or life-threatening neutropenia, which occurred in 65% of hydrazine sulfate patients and 63% of placebo patients. There were no differences noted between the two groups in degree of anorexia, weight gain or loss, or overall nutritional status. Sensory and motor neuropathy occurred significantly more often in patients treated with hydrazine sulfate. Quality of life was significantly worse in patients who received hydrazine sulfate.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests no benefit from the addition of hydrazine sulfate to an effective cytotoxic regimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8201372     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.6.1113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  11 in total

1.  Validation of survival prognostic models for non-small-cell lung cancer in stage- and age-specific groups.

Authors:  Xiaofei Wang; Lin Gu; Ying Zhang; Daniel J Sargent; William Richards; Apar Kishor Ganti; Jeffery Crawford; Harvey Jay Cohen; Thomas Stinchcombe; Everett Vokes; Herbert Pang
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 5.705

Review 2.  Managing cancer-related anorexia/cachexia.

Authors:  G Mantovani; A Macciò; E Massa; C Madeddu
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  A review of the drug treatment of cachexia associated with cancer.

Authors:  B Gagnon; E Bruera
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Unconventional therapies for cancer: 4. Hydrazine sulfate. Task Force on Alternative Therapies of the Canadian Breast Cancer Research Initiative.

Authors:  E Kaegi
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-05-19       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Evaluation of quality of life for diverse patient populations.

Authors:  K R Yabroff; B P Linas; K Schulman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Quality of life in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a Southwest Oncology Group randomized trial.

Authors:  C M Moinpour; B Lyons; P K Grevstad; L C Lovato; J Crowley; K Czaplicki; Z M Buckner; P A Ganz; K Kelly; D R Gandara
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Differences in clinical trial patient attributes and outcomes according to enrollment setting.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Lamont; Mary Beth Landrum; Nancy L Keating; Laura Archer; Lan Lan; Gary M Strauss; Rogerio Lilenbaum; Harvey B Niell; L Herbert Maurer; Michael P Kosty; Antonius A Miller; Gerald H Clamon; Anthony D Elias; Edward F McClay; Everett E Vokes; Barbara J McNeil
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Tomorrow's cancer treatments today: the first 50 years of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

Authors:  Mark R Green; Stephen L George; Richard L Schilsky
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.929

9.  Patient education level as a predictor of survival in lung cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  James E Herndon; Alice B Kornblith; Jimmie C Holland; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Experience of the treatment with Sehydrin (Hydrazine Sulfate, HS) in the advanced cancer patients.

Authors:  V A Filov; M L Gershanovich; L A Danova; B A Ivin
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.850

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.