Literature DB >> 8198306

Hand washing frequency in an emergency department.

M R Meengs1, B K Giles, C D Chisholm, W H Cordell, D R Nelson.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Previous studies, conducted mainly in ICUs, have shown low compliance with hand-washing recommendations, with failure rates approaching 60%. Hand washing in the emergency department has not been studied. We examined the frequency and duration of hand washing in one ED and the effects of three variables: level of training, type of patient contact (clean, dirty, or gloved), and years of staff clinical experience.
DESIGN: Observational.
SETTING: ED of an 1,100-bed tertiary referral, central city, private teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Emergency nurses, faculty, and resident physicians. Participants were informed that their activities were being monitored but were unaware of the exact nature of the study.
INTERVENTIONS: An observer recorded the number of patient contacts and activities for each participant during three-hour observation periods. Activities were categorized as either clean or dirty according to a scale devised by Fulkerson. The use of gloves was noted and hand-washing technique and duration were recorded. A hand-washing break in technique was defined as failure to wash hands after a patient contact and before proceeding to another patient or activity.
RESULTS: Eleven faculty, 11 resident physicians, and 13 emergency nurses were observed. Of 409 total contacts, 272 were clean, 46 were dirty, and 91 were gloved. Hand washing occurred after 32.3% of total contacts (SD, 2.31%). Nurses washed after 58.2% of 146 contacts (SD, 4.1%), residents after 18.6% of 129 contacts (SD, 3.4%), and faculty after 17.2% of 134 contacts (SD, 3.3%). Nurses had a significantly higher hand washing frequency than either faculty (P < .0001) or resident physicians (P < .0001). Hand washes occurred after 28.4% of 272 clean contacts (SD, 2.34%), which was significantly less (P < .0001) than 50.0% of 46 dirty contacts (SD, 7.4%) and 64.8% of 91 gloved contacts (SD, 5.0%). The number of years of clinical experience was not significantly related to hand-washing frequency (P = .82). Soap and water were used in 126 of the hand washes, and an alcohol preparation was used in the remaining six. The average duration of soap-and-water hand washes was 9.5 seconds.
CONCLUSION: Compliance with hand washing recommendations was low in this ED. Nurses washed their hands significantly more often than either staff physicians or resident physicians, but the average hand-washing duration was less than recommended for all groups. Poor compliance in the ED may be due to the large number of patient contacts, simultaneous management of multiple patients, high illness acuity, and severe time constraints. Strategies for improving compliance with this fundamental method of infection control need to be explored because simple educational interventions have been unsuccessful in other health care settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8198306     DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70357-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  10 in total

1.  Bacterial hand contamination and transfer after use of contaminated bulk-soap-refillable dispensers.

Authors:  Carrie A Zapka; Esther J Campbell; Sheri L Maxwell; Charles P Gerba; Michael J Dolan; James W Arbogast; David R Macinga
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Handwashing patterns in primary pediatric community clinics.

Authors:  H A Cohen; A Matalon; J Amir; G Paret; A Barzilai
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 3.  Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs.

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Axel Kramer
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Participant observation of time allocation, direct patient contact and simultaneous activities in hospital physicians.

Authors:  Matthias Weigl; Andreas Müller; Andrea Zupanc; Peter Angerer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 5.  Infection prevention in the emergency department.

Authors:  Stephen Y Liang; Daniel L Theodoro; Jeremiah D Schuur; Jonas Marschall
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 5.721

6.  Self-Reported Use of Personal Protective Equipment among Emergency Department Nurses, Physicians and Advanced Practice Providers during the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Roslyn M Seitz; Anna Q Yaffee; Elizabeth Peacock; Timothy P Moran; Andrew Pendley; Jonathan D Rupp
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Improving hand hygiene compliance in the emergency department: getting to the point.

Authors:  Simone Scheithauer; Vanessa Kamerseder; Peter Petersen; Jörg Christian Brokmann; Luis-Alberto Lopez-Gonzalez; Carsten Mach; Roland Schulze-Röbbecke; Sebastian W Lemmen
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.090

8.  Bactericidal and Virucidal Activity of Povidone-Iodine and Chlorhexidine Gluconate Cleansers in an In Vivo Hand Hygiene Clinical Simulation Study.

Authors:  Maren Eggers; Torsten Koburger-Janssen; Lois S Ward; Craig Newby; Stefan Müller
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2018-05-14

Review 9.  Infection Prevention for the Emergency Department: Out of Reach or Standard of Care?

Authors:  Stephen Y Liang; Madison Riethman; Josephine Fox
Journal:  Emerg Med Clin North Am       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 2.264

10.  Compliance with hygiene practices among healthcare workers at an academic hospital emergency department.

Authors:  Abdullah E Laher; Ljuba-Ruth Van Rooyen; Ali Jawa; Callistus Oa Enyuma; Kylen M Swartzberg
Journal:  Afr J Emerg Med       Date:  2021-07-22
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.