Literature DB >> 8198262

Sequential combined spinal epidural block versus spinal block for cesarean section: effects on maternal hypotension and neurobehavioral function of the newborn.

T Thorén1, B Holmström, N Rawal, J Schollin, S Lindeberg, G Skeppner.   

Abstract

Sequential combined spinal-epidural (CSE) block was compared with spinal block for elective cesarean section. The quality of surgical analgesia and the effect on maternal blood pressure and neonatal neurobehavioral function were evaluated. Forty-two healthy parturients were randomly divided into a spinal (n = 21) and a sequential CSE (n = 21) group. A T4 sensory block was targeted. In the spinal group, 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine, 2.5 mL, was injected into the subarachnoid space through a 26-gauge Quincke needle. In the sequential CSE group, 1.5 mL of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine was injected into the subarachnoid space through a long 26-gauge Quincke needle, which was introduced through an 18-gauge Tuohy needle. An epidural catheter was then inserted. If the block in the sequential CSE group did not reach the T4 level in 15 min, it was extended by fractionated doses of 0.5% bupivacaine administered through the epidural catheter. Ephedrine, 10 mg intravenously (i.v.), was given to treat hypotension (20% decrease from baseline value and/or systolic blood pressure below 100 mmHg). The time intervals from induction of block to start of surgery and to delivery were shorter in the spinal group (P < 0.01). Cephalad spread of block (pinprick) 15 min after induction was T4 [T2-T7] (median [range]) in the spinal group and T7 [T2-L1] in the sequential CSE group (P < 0.05). All patients in the sequential CSE group needed epidural bupivacaine, 53.8 +/- 6.5 mg (mean +/- SEM). The surgical analgesia was good or excellent in both groups before delivery.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8198262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  8 in total

Review 1.  Conversion of labour epidural analgesia to surgical anaesthesia for emergency intrapartum Caesarean section.

Authors:  N Desai; B Carvalho
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2019-11-19

Review 2.  [Recent standards in management of obstetric anesthesia].

Authors:  Maximiliaan van Erp; Clemens Ortner; Stefan Jochberger; Klaus Ulrich Klein
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2017-07-25

3.  Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean section; needle-through-needle approach.

Authors:  Toshinori Tsutsui; Kumiko Nakamura; Kenji Muranaka
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 4.  Needle gauge and tip designs for preventing post-dural puncture headache (PDPH).

Authors:  Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez; Luis Muñoz; Natalia Godoy-Casasbuenas; Agustín Ciapponi; Jimmy J Arevalo; Sabine Boogaard; Marta Roqué I Figuls
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-07

Review 5.  Spinal anaesthesia in obstetrics.

Authors:  P Morgan
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.063

6.  Improvement of quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials to prevent hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.

Authors:  A Herdan; R Roth; D Grass; M Klimek; S Will; B Schauf; R Rossaint; M Heesen
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2010-12-18

Review 7.  Combined spinal-epidural versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.

Authors:  Scott W Simmons; Alicia T Dennis; Allan M Cyna; Matthew G Richardson; Matthew R Bright
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-11

8.  Labor Epidural Analgesia to Cesarean Section Anesthetic Conversion Failure: A National Survey.

Authors:  Neel Desai; Andrew Gardner; Brendan Carvalho
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2019-06-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.