Literature DB >> 8197934

Fast spin-echo MR in the detection of vertebral metastases: comparison of three sequences.

K M Jones1, R B Schwartz, M T Mantello, S S Ahn, R Khorasani, S Mukherji, K Oshio, R V Mulkern.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the relative capabilities for the detection of vertebral metastases of three available fast spin-echo sequences: T1-weighted fast spin-echo, short tau inversion recovery (STIR) fast spin-echo, and T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequences with chemical shift selective saturation pulse fat suppression.
METHODS: Fourteen patients were evaluated prospectively over a 2-month period with T1-weighted fast spin-echo (four echo train, four acquisitions, 1 min 59 sec-2 min 37 sec). STIR fast spin-echo (16 echo train, four acquisitions, 2 min 30 sec-3 min 19 sec), and T2-weighted fast spin-echo (16 echo train, 4 acquisitions, 2 min 27 sec-3 min 16 sec). For all three pulse sequences, measurements were obtained of the signal intensities of normal marrow, abnormal marrow, fat, and noise posterior to the spine. Contrast-to-noise ratios were calculated for metastases in each case. Lesions were evaluated by three observers and rated for size, location, and conspicuity.
RESULTS: Signal intensities of fat, normal marrow, and noise were highest for T1-weighted fast spin-echo sequences. STIR fast spin-echo and fat-suppressed T2-weighted fast spin-echo had approximately similar fat-suppression capabilities. Though contrast-to-noise ratios were highest overall for STIR fast spin-echo, the finding was not statistically significant and lesion conspicuity was deemed better with fat-suppressed T2-weighted fast spin-echo and T1-weighted fast spin-echo images. Discrete lesions were well identified on all three pulse sequences.
CONCLUSION: Fast spin-echo sequences appear promising for the detection of vertebral metastases. Further work should be directed toward comparison with conventional spin-echo to determine whether fast spin-echo may replace conventional spin-echo sequences for evaluation of vertebral metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8197934      PMCID: PMC8334304     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  9 in total

1.  Bone marrow lesions: evaluation with fat-suppression turbo spin echo MR imaging at 0.5 T.

Authors:  H Chrysikopoulos; J Pappas; N Papanikolaou; A Papazoglou; A Roussakis; J Andreou
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Detection of vertebral metastases: a meta-analysis comparing MRI, CT, PET, BS and BS with SPECT.

Authors:  Tao Liu; Shenghao Wang; Hao Liu; Bin Meng; Feng Zhou; Fan He; Xiaojian Shi; Huilin Yang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  FSE T2-weighted two-point Dixon technique for fat suppression in the lumbar spine: comparison with SPAIR technique.

Authors:  Sangmin Lee; Dae Seob Choi; Hwa Seon Shin; Hye Jin Baek; Ho Cheol Choi; Sung Eun Park
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 4.  Tumors of the osseous spine.

Authors:  Narayan Sundaresan; Stephano Boriani; Allen Rothman; Robert Holtzman
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2004 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Detection of vertebral metastases: a comparison between the modified Dixon turbo spin echo T2 weighted MRI and conventional T1 weighted MRI: a preliminary study in a tertiary centre.

Authors:  Seok Hahn; Young Han Lee; Jin-Suck Suh
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Musculoskeletal tumors: how to use anatomic, functional, and metabolic MR techniques.

Authors:  Laura M Fayad; Michael A Jacobs; Xin Wang; John A Carrino; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Fat-suppressed MR Imaging of the Spine for Metal Artifact Reduction at 3T: Comparison of STIR and Slice Encoding for Metal Artifact Correction Fat-suppressed T2-weighted Images.

Authors:  Young Han Lee; Seok Hahn; Eunju Kim; Jin-Suck Suh
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 2.471

8.  Posterior occiput-cervical fixation for metastasis to upper cervical spine.

Authors:  Tarush Rustagi; Hazem Mashaly; Ehud Mendel
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun

9.  Solitary spinal epidural metastasis from lung carcinoma.

Authors:  Manoj Gupta; Ps Choudhary; Anurag Jain; Ankur Pruthi
Journal:  Indian J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.