Literature DB >> 8196118

Environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer in nonsmoking women. A multicenter study.

E T Fontham1, P Correa, P Reynolds, A Wu-Williams, P A Buffler, R S Greenberg, V W Chen, T Alterman, P Boyd, D F Austin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative risk (RR) of lung cancer in lifetime never smokers associated with environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure.
DESIGN: Multicenter population-based case-control study.
SETTING: Five metropolitan areas in the United States: Atlanta, Ga, Houston, Tex, Los Angeles, Calif, New Orleans, La, and the San Francisco Bay Area, Calif. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Female lifetime never smokers: 653 cases with histologically confirmed lung cancer and 1253 controls selected by random digit dialing and random sampling from the Health Care Financing Administration files for women aged 65 years and older. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The RR of lung cancer, estimated by adjusted odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI), associated with ETS exposure.
RESULTS: Tobacco use by spouse(s) was associated with a 30% excess risk of lung cancer: all types of primary lung carcinoma (adjusted OR = 1.29; P < .05), pulmonary adenocarcinoma (adjusted OR = 1.28; P < .05), and other primary carcinomas of the lung (adjusted OR = 1.37; P = .18). An increasing RR of lung cancer was observed with increasing pack-years of spousal ETS exposure (trend P = .03), such that an 80% excess risk of lung cancer was observed for subjects with 80 or more pack-years of exposure from a spouse (adjusted OR = 1.79; 95% CI = 0.99 to 3.25). The excess risk of lung cancer among women ever exposed to ETS during adult life in the household was 24%; in the workplace, 39%; and in social settings, 50%. When these sources were considered jointly, an increasing risk of lung cancer with increasing duration of exposure was observed (trend P = .001). At the highest level of exposure, there was a 75% increased risk. No significant association was found between exposure during childhood to household ETS exposure from mother, father, or other household members; however, women who were exposed during childhood had higher RRs associated with adult-life ETS exposures than women with no childhood exposure. At the highest level of adult smoke-years of exposure, the ORs for women with and without childhood exposures were 3.25 (95% CI, 2.42 to 7.46) and 1.77 (95% CI, 0.98 to 3.19), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Exposure to ETS during adult life increases risk of lung cancer in lifetime nonsmokers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8196118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  39 in total

1.  Lung cancer risk and workplace exposure to environmental tobacco smoke.

Authors:  Leslie Stayner; James Bena; Annie J Sasco; Randall Smith; Kyle Steenland; Michaela Kreuzer; Kurt Straif
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Tobacco use and nicotine dependence among HIV-infected and uninfected injection drug users.

Authors:  Mariah M Marshall; Gregory D Kirk; Neil E Caporaso; Meredith C McCormack; Christian A Merlo; John C Hague; Shruti H Mehta; Eric A Engels
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2010-09-26       Impact factor: 3.913

3.  Smoking and hormesis as confounding factors in radiation pulmonary carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Charles L Sanders; Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Role of Human Aldo-Keto Reductases in the Metabolic Activation of the Carcinogenic Air Pollutant 3-Nitrobenzanthrone.

Authors:  Jessica R Murray; Clementina A Mesaros; Volker M Arlt; Albrecht Seidel; Ian A Blair; Trevor M Penning
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 5.  Second-hand smoke and human lung cancer.

Authors:  Ahmad Besaratinia; Gerd P Pfeifer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 6.  Lung cancer in never smokers: clinical epidemiology and environmental risk factors.

Authors:  Jonathan M Samet; Erika Avila-Tang; Paolo Boffetta; Lindsay M Hannan; Susan Olivo-Marston; Michael J Thun; Charles M Rudin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Lung cancer from passive smoking at work.

Authors:  A J Wells
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Risk factors for lung cancer in Iowa women: implications for prevention.

Authors:  John S Neuberger; Jonathan D Mahnken; Matthew S Mayo; R William Field
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  2006-04-03

9.  Understanding the role of family dynamics, perceived norms, and lung cancer worry in predicting second-hand smoke avoidance among high-risk lung cancer families.

Authors:  Mark Manning; Mark Wojda; Lauren Hamel; Alicia Salkowski; Ann G Schwartz; Felicity Wk Harper
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2016-03-07

10.  Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphisms and lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Renfang Mao; Yihui Fan; Yan Jin; Jing Bai; Songbin Fu
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 3.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.