Literature DB >> 8196060

Amino/aromatic interactions in proteins: is the evidence stacked against hydrogen bonding?

J B Mitchell1, C L Nandi, I K McDonald, J M Thornton, S L Price.   

Abstract

We investigate the suggestion that aromatic rings can act as hydrogen-bond acceptors in proteins, by an analysis of 55 non-homologous high-resolution protein chain structures. Approximately 10% of interactions between sp2 hybridized nitrogen atoms, from either side-chains or main-chains, and phenylalanine or tyrosine rings have the nitrogen atom positioned above the ring. In these instances, however, the sp2 nitrogen atoms tend to form stacked interactions with the aromatic rings, these geometries outnumbering amino/aromatic hydrogen bonds by around 2.5:1. The statistically expected distribution, in contrast, would have only a few stacked structures and many more with larger interplanar angles, corresponding to amino/aromatic hydrogen bonds. Thus, although we do find some of these unconventional hydrogen bonds, they are clearly disfavoured relative to stacked geometries. In stacked geometries, the nitrogen-bearing groups are observed to fulfil their hydrogen-bonding potential by forming conventional, energetically stronger, hydrogen bonds with other groups in protein or solvent. This may explain the favourability of stacking. Thus, although ab initio calculations of the gas phase interaction energies for three model systems generally favour the amino/aromatic hydrogen-bonded over the stacked geometries, the differences are small enough to be outweighed easily by the additional conventional hydrogen bonding in stacked structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8196060     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  44 in total

1.  The molecular structure of an unusual cytochrome c2 determined at 2.0 A; the cytochrome cH from Methylobacterium extorquens.

Authors:  J Read; R Gill; S L Dales; J B Cooper; S P Wood; C Anthony
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Calculating the knowledge-based similarity of functional groups using crystallographic data.

Authors:  P Watson; P Willett; V J Gillet; M L Verdonk
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Direct detection of CH/pi interactions in proteins.

Authors:  Michael J Plevin; David L Bryce; Jérôme Boisbouvier
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 24.427

4.  Structural stability studies in adhesion molecules--role of cation-π interactions.

Authors:  K Sophiya; Anand Anbarasu
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.356

5.  A binding mechanism in protein-nucleotide interactions: implication for U1A RNA binding.

Authors:  Victor Guallar; Kenneth W Borrelli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Activation and proton transport mechanism in influenza A M2 channel.

Authors:  Chenyu Wei; Andrew Pohorille
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Side-chain to backbone interactions dictate the conformational preferences of a cyclopentane arginine analogue.

Authors:  Guillem Revilla-López; Juan Torras; Ana I Jiménez; Carlos Cativiela; Ruth Nussinov; Carlos Alemán
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 4.354

8.  Determinants of strand register in antiparallel beta-sheets of proteins.

Authors:  E G Hutchinson; R B Sessions; J M Thornton; D N Woolfson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Conformational preferences of 1-amino-2-phenylcyclohexanecarboxylic acid, a phenylalanine cyclohexane analogue.

Authors:  Carlos Alemán; Ana I Jiménez; Carlos Cativiela; Ruth Nussinov; Jordi Casanovas
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 4.354

10.  Contribution of the tyrosines to the structure and function of the human U1A N-terminal RNA binding domain.

Authors:  J K Kranz; J Lu; K B Hall
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 6.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.