Literature DB >> 8196033

APACHE II scoring system on a general intensive care unit: audit of daily APACHE II scores and 6-month survival of 691 patients admitted to a general intensive care unit between May 1990 and December 1991.

N N Campbell1, M A Tooley, S M Willatts.   

Abstract

In this paper we present a detailed analysis of the use of the APACHE II (acute physiological and chronic health evaluation) scoring system on all of the patients admitted to the general intensive care unit at the Bristol Royal Infirmary over a 20-month period. The 6-month survival of 691 adult medical and surgical patients following intensive care was recorded and this data was analysed with admission and daily APACHE II scores using a relational database. Our data confirms the relationship between admission APACHE II scores and outcome, with mean scores decreasing as duration of survival increases. We also demonstrate that the best day one scores are approximately 50% less than the admission score, irrespective of outcome, indicating the benefit of intensive care. By contrast, however, the scores on day one have either not improved or have worsened since admission, reflecting the importance of the pre-morbid health status of the patient in determining outcome from intensive care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8196033      PMCID: PMC1294319          DOI: 10.1177/014107689408700205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   18.000


  22 in total

1.  Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale.

Authors:  G Teasdale; B Jennett
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1974-07-13       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system.

Authors:  W A Knaus; E A Draper; D P Wagner; J E Zimmerman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Immediate and long-term survival in patients admitted to a respiratory ICU.

Authors:  P D Potgieter; E Rosenthal; S R Benatar
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  A comparison of intensive care in the U.S.A. and France.

Authors:  W A Knaus; J R Le Gall; D P Wagner; E A Draper; P Loirat; R A Campos; D J Cullen; M K Kohles; P Glaser; C Granthil; P Mercier; F Nicolas; P Nikki; B Shin; J V Snyder; F Wattel; J E Zimmerman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1982-09-18       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Statistical validation of a severity of illness measure.

Authors:  D P Wagner; W A Knaus; E A Draper
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Surgeons, surgery and pancreatitis.

Authors:  J L Meakins
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin Biol       Date:  1984 Jun-Jul

7.  A method for predicting survival and mortality of ICU patients using objectively derived weights.

Authors:  S Lemeshow; D Teres; H Pastides; J S Avrunin; J S Steingrub
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Prognosis in acute organ-system failure.

Authors:  W A Knaus; E A Draper; D P Wagner; J E Zimmerman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Long term survival after intensive care.

Authors:  S Ridley; R Jackson; J Findlay; P Wallace
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-11-17

10.  Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method. Trauma Score and the Injury Severity Score.

Authors:  C R Boyd; M A Tolson; W S Copes
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1987-04
View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of nutritional risk status assessment tools in predicting 30-day survival in critically ill COVID-19 pneumonia patients.

Authors:  Umut Sabri Kasapoglu; Abdullah Gok; Leman Acun Delen; Ayse Belin Ozer
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 1.707

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.