Literature DB >> 4006490

A method for predicting survival and mortality of ICU patients using objectively derived weights.

S Lemeshow, D Teres, H Pastides, J S Avrunin, J S Steingrub.   

Abstract

Data at ICU admission and after 24 h in the ICU were collected on 755 patients, to derive multiple logistic regression models for predicting hospital mortality. The derived models contained relatively few and easily obtained variables. The weight associated with each variable was determined objectively. There were seven admission variables, none of which were treatment dependent, and seven 24-h variables reflecting treatments and patients' conditions in the ICU. Predicted outcomes using these two models were closely correlated with actual outcome. Theoretically, a predictive model would be useful to physicians for triage decisions as well as determining aggressiveness of care through discussions with families, determining utilization of ICU facilities, and objectively comparing different ICUs. This research represents an initial attempt to develop models that are not based on subjectively determined weights.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4006490     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-198507000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  37 in total

Review 1.  [Scoring systems in the intensive care unit].

Authors:  K Lewandowski; M Lewandowski
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Simplification of the SAPS by selecting independent variables.

Authors:  X Viviand; J Gouvernet; C Granthil; G François
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Evaluation of APACHE II for cost containment and quality assurance.

Authors:  J M Civetta; J A Hudson-Civetta; L D Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  The influence of missing components of the Acute Physiology Score of APACHE III on the measurement of ICU performance.

Authors:  Bekele Afessa; Mark T Keegan; Ognjen Gajic; Rolf D Hubmayr; Steve G Peters
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Scoring and outcome audit systems relevant to emergency medicine.

Authors:  M Waters; P Nightingale
Journal:  Arch Emerg Med       Date:  1990-03

Review 6.  A reader's guide to the evaluation of prognostic studies.

Authors:  C van Walraven; P C Hébert
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.401

7.  An Interpretable ICU Mortality Prediction Model Based on Logistic Regression and Recurrent Neural Networks with LSTM units.

Authors:  Wendong Ge; Jin-Won Huh; Yu Rang Park; Jae-Ho Lee; Young-Hak Kim; Alexander Turchin
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-12-05

Review 8.  Clinical review: scoring systems in the critically ill.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Vincent; Rui Moreno
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Use of the All Patient Refined-Diagnosis Related Group (APR-DRG) Risk of Mortality Score as a Severity Adjustor in the Medical ICU.

Authors:  Daniel Baram; Feroza Daroowalla; Ruel Garcia; Guangxiang Zhang; John J Chen; Erin Healy; Syed Ali Riaz; Paul Richman
Journal:  Clin Med Circ Respirat Pulm Med       Date:  2008-04-18

10.  Correlation of metabolic acidosis with outcome following injury and its value as a scoring tool.

Authors:  R E Falcone; S A Santanello; M A Schulz; J Monk; B Satiani; L C Carey
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.