Literature DB >> 8194544

Comparison of muscle cross-sectional area and strength between untrained women and men.

H Kanehisa1, S Ikegawa, T Fukunaga.   

Abstract

The cross-sectional areas (CSA) of fat, muscle and bone tissues of the limb as well as maximal voluntary isokinetic strength were measured in untrained men (n = 27) and women (n = 26) aged 18-25 years. Anatomical CSA of the three tissues were determined by ultrasound on the upper arm and thigh. The isokinetic strength of the elbow and knee extensor and flexor muscles were measured by an isokinetic dynamometer (Cybex II) at 1.05 rad.s-1. The women had significantly (P < 0.001) larger fat CSA and smaller bone and muscle CSA than the men in both the upper arm and thigh. Among tissue CSA, the largest difference between the women and men was found in fat CSA regardless of the measurement sites. The sex differences in bone and muscle CSA were found largely in the upper arm compared to the thigh, even when expressed per unit second power of the limb length. Regression analyses of the data for respective samples for the men and women showed significant correlations (r = 0.411-0.707, P < 0.05-P < 0.001) between CSA and strength in all muscle groups except for the elbow extensors of the men (r = 0.328, P > 0.05) and the elbow flexors of the women (r = 0.388, P > 0.05). No significant difference between sexes was observed when strength was expressed per unit of muscle CSA (F.CSA-1) for the elbow flexors and extensors. However, the men showed significantly higher F.CSA-1 than the women for the knee flexors and extensors (P < 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8194544     DOI: 10.1007/bf00244028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol        ISSN: 0301-5548


  32 in total

1.  Influence of subtypes of fast-twitch fibers on isokinetic strength in untrained men.

Authors:  T Ryushi; T Fukunaga
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.118

2.  The role of learning and coordination in strength training.

Authors:  O M Rutherford; D A Jones
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1986

3.  Motor-unit discharge rates in maximal voluntary contractions of three human muscles.

Authors:  F Bellemare; J J Woods; R Johansson; B Bigland-Ritchie
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The relative proportions of fat, muscle and bone in the normal human forearm as determined by computed tomography.

Authors:  R J Maughan; J S Watson; J Weir
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 6.124

5.  Sex difference in strength.

Authors:  T Hoffman; R W Stauffer; A S Jackson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1979 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 6.  Strength training for female athletes. A review of selected aspects.

Authors:  J B Holloway; T R Baechle
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Muscle hypertrophy in men and women.

Authors:  K J Cureton; M A Collins; D W Hill; F M McElhannon
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Radiographically determined widths of bone muscle and fat in the upper arm and calf from age 3-18 years.

Authors:  J M Tanner; P C Hughes; R H Whitehouse
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  1981 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.533

9.  Sex difference in muscular strength in equally-trained men and women.

Authors:  P Bishop; K Cureton; M Collins
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  The size and strength of the quadriceps muscles of old and young men.

Authors:  A Young; M Stokes; M Crowe
Journal:  Clin Physiol       Date:  1985-04
View more
  35 in total

1.  Velocity associated characteristics of force production in college weight lifters.

Authors:  H Kanehisa; T Fukunaga
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  Assessment and interpretation of isokinetic muscle strength during growth and maturation.

Authors:  Mark De Ste Croix; Martine Deighan; Neil Armstrong
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Neurophysiological correlates of aging-related muscle weakness.

Authors:  Ela B Plow; David A Cunningham; Corin Bonnett; Dina Gohar; Mehmed Bayram; Alexandria Wyant; Nicole Varnerin; Bernadett Mamone; Vlodek Siemionow; Juliet Hou; Andre Machado; Guang H Yue
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Allometric scaling of strength measurements to body size.

Authors:  J P Folland; T M Mc Cauley; A G Williams
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  In vivo specific tension of the human quadriceps femoris muscle.

Authors:  Robert M Erskine; David A Jones; Constantinos N Maganaris; Hans Degens
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Ultrasound elastography in children: establishing the normal range of muscle elasticity.

Authors:  Netanel S Berko; Erin F Fitzgerald; Terry D Amaral; Monica Payares; Terry L Levin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-10-09

Review 7.  Unique aspects of competitive weightlifting: performance, training and physiology.

Authors:  Adam Storey; Heather K Smith
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  The contribution of muscle hypertrophy to strength changes following resistance training.

Authors:  Robert M Erskine; Gareth Fletcher; Jonathan P Folland
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-03-09       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Sex differences in force steadiness in three positions of the forearm.

Authors:  Ruth E Brown; Darl L Edwards; Jennifer M Jakobi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Sex difference in force generation capacity during repeated maximal knee extensions.

Authors:  H Kanehisa; H Okuyama; S Ikegawa; T Fukunaga
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1996
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.