Literature DB >> 8193524

Efficacy and safety of two different galenic formulations of a transdermal clonidine system in the treatment of hypertension.

R E Kolloch1, L Mehlburger, H Schumacher, B O Göbel.   

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of two different galenic formulations of transdermal clonidine systems were compared in 905 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension during a 12 weeks observation period. 449 patients were treated with the matrix controlled clonidine transdermal (C-TD) system and 456 patients with the membrane controlled clonidine system (C-TTS). The mean blood pressure was reduced from 168/102 mmHg to 146/87 mmHg in the C-TD and from 169/102 mmHg to 148/88 mmHg in the C-TTS group. There was no difference in the response rate. The pattern of systemic side-effects appeared to correspond to those seen during oral clonidine treatment but with a lower frequency and intensity. The C-TD patch improved skin tolerability and the drop-out rate due to skin reactions was 2.2 times lower compared with the C-TTS group. Local skin reactions led to withdrawal in 35 of 449 C-TD treated and in 79 of 456 C-TTS treated patients. In conclusion, the improved carrier system for the transdermal clonidine treatment reduced local side-effects which in turn may further enhance acceptability and compliance in treated patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8193524     DOI: 10.1007/bf01829456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Auton Res        ISSN: 0959-9851            Impact factor:   4.435


  15 in total

Review 1.  Adverse dermatologic reactions to transdermal drug delivery systems.

Authors:  D J Hogan; H I Maibach
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 11.527

2.  The 1988 report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1988-05

3.  A double-blind comparison of transdermal clonidine and oral captopril in essential hypertension.

Authors:  F G McMahon; A K Jain; R Vargas; J Fillingim
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.393

4.  Clinical acceptability of transdermal clonidine: a large-scale evaluation by practitioners.

Authors:  J Hollifield
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 5.  Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and moderate hypertension.

Authors:  D McAreavey; J I Robertson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Clonidine hydrochloride: review of pharmacologic and clinical aspects.

Authors:  M C Houston
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  1981 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 8.194

7.  Low allergenicity of clonidine impedes studies of sensitization mechanisms in guinea pig models.

Authors:  R J Scheper; B M von Blomberg; J de Groot; A R Goeptar; M Lang; R A Oostendorp; D P Bruynzeel; R G van Tol
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 6.600

8.  Transdermal clonidine in mild hypertension. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  S Popli; J T Daugirdas; J A Neubauer; B Hockenberry; J E Hano; T S Ing
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1986-11

9.  Oral substitution in patients sensitized by transdermal clonidine treatment.

Authors:  H I Maibach
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 6.600

10.  Comparison of propranolol and hydrochlorothiazide for the initial treatment of hypertension. II. Results of long-term therapy. Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1982-10-22       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.