Literature DB >> 2191779

A double-blind comparison of transdermal clonidine and oral captopril in essential hypertension.

F G McMahon1, A K Jain, R Vargas, J Fillingim.   

Abstract

In a double-blind study, patients with mild essential hypertension were randomly assigned to treatment with transdermal clonidine or oral captopril. After a two- to three-week titration period, blood pressure decreased significantly from 146.3/95.4 to 134.7/85.1 mmHg in the 33 clonidine-treated patients and from 143.0/96.1 to 134.8/87.1 mmHg in the 35 captopril-treated patients; the mean daily doses were 0.2 mg (equivalent) of clonidine and 122.9 mg of captopril. After eight weeks of treatment, blood pressures were reduced to 132.9/85.2 mmHg in the clonidine group (n = 22) and 131.2/82.5 mmHg in the captopril group (n = 16). In black patients, blood pressure reductions were greater with clonidine than with captopril. Four patients were withdrawn from treatment because of side effects in the clonidine group and one in the captopril group. No between-group differences were found in the responses to a quality-of-life questionnaire completed before and after treatment. The clonidine patches were worn during 99% of patient-weeks of treatment; captopril was taken as directed during 64% of patient-weeks of treatment. It is concluded that transdermal clonidine is safe and effective and well accepted by hypertensive patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2191779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  8 in total

Review 1.  Preferred Fourth-Line Pharmacotherapy for Resistant Hypertension: Are We There Yet?

Authors:  Hamish Cg Prosser; Cynthia Gregory; Dagmara Hering; Graham S Hillis; Greg Perry; Johan Rosman; Carl Schultz; Mark Thomas; Gerald F Watts; Markus P Schlaich
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  Translating safety, efficacy and compliance into economic value for controlled release dosage forms.

Authors:  M P Cramer; S R Saks
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Efficacy and safety of two different galenic formulations of a transdermal clonidine system in the treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  R E Kolloch; L Mehlburger; H Schumacher; B O Göbel
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.435

4.  Long-term (5 year) experience with transdermal clonidine in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.

Authors:  J Breidthardt; H Schumacher; L Mehlburger
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.435

Review 5.  The USA experience with the clonidine transdermal therapeutic system.

Authors:  J F Burris
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.435

6.  Transdermal clonidine skin reactions.

Authors:  L Michael Prisant
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Clonidine versus Captopril for Severe Postpartum Hypertension: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Carlos Noronha Neto C; Sabina S B Maia; Leila Katz; Isabela C Coutinho; Alex R Souza; Melania M Amorim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Transdermal clonidine: therapeutic considerations.

Authors:  Domenic A Sica; Rebecca Grubbs
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.738

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.