Literature DB >> 8192841

Saturation of subjective reward magnitude as a function of current and pulse frequency.

J M Simmons1, C R Gallistel.   

Abstract

In rats with electrodes in the medial forebrain bundle, the upper portion of the function relating the experienced magnitude of the reward to pulse frequency was determined at currents ranging from 100 to 1,000 microA. The pulse frequency required to produce an asymptotic level of reward was inversely proportional to current except at the lowest currents and highest pulse frequencies. At a given current, the subjective reward magnitude functions decelerated to an asymptote over an interval in which the pulse frequency doubled or tripled. The asymptotic level of reward was approximately constant for currents between 200 and 1,000 microA but declined substantially at currents at or below 100 microA and pulse frequencies at or above 250 to 400 pulses per second. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that the magnitude of the experienced reward depends only on the number of action potentials generated by the train of pulses in the bundle of reward-relevant axons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8192841     DOI: 10.1037//0735-7044.108.1.151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  13 in total

1.  Optimal indolence: a normative microscopic approach to work and leisure.

Authors:  Ritwik K Niyogi; Yannick-Andre Breton; Rebecca B Solomon; Kent Conover; Peter Shizgal; Peter Dayan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Medial forebrain bundle lesions fail to structurally and functionally disconnect the ventral tegmental area from many ipsilateral forebrain nuclei: implications for the neural substrate of brain stimulation reward.

Authors:  J M Simmons; R F Ackermann; C R Gallistel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Cue-evoked dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens shell tracks reinforcer magnitude during intracranial self-stimulation.

Authors:  M Beyene; R M Carelli; R M Wightman
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Cannabinoid receptor blockade reduces the opportunity cost at which rats maintain operant performance for rewarding brain stimulation.

Authors:  Ivan Trujillo-Pisanty; Giovanni Hernandez; Ian Moreau-Debord; Marie-Pierre Cossette; Kent Conover; Joseph F Cheer; Peter Shizgal
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  At what stage of neural processing does cocaine act to boost pursuit of rewards?

Authors:  Giovanni Hernandez; Yannick-André Breton; Kent Conover; Peter Shizgal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A new view of the effect of dopamine receptor antagonism on operant performance for rewarding brain stimulation in the rat.

Authors:  I Trujillo-Pisanty; K Conover; P Shizgal
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  The effects of reinforcer magnitude on timing in rats.

Authors:  Elliot A Ludvig; Kent Conover; Peter Shizgal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Scarce means with alternative uses: robbins' definition of economics and its extension to the behavioral and neurobiological study of animal decision making.

Authors:  Peter Shizgal
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Validation and extension of the reward-mountain model.

Authors:  Yannick-André Breton; Ada Mullett; Kent Conover; Peter Shizgal
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  The effect of probability discounting on reward seeking: a three-dimensional perspective.

Authors:  Yannick-André Breton; Kent Conover; Peter Shizgal
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.