Literature DB >> 8192619

A model system for analysis of family resemblance in extended kinships of twins.

K R Truett1, L J Eaves, E E Walters, A C Heath, J K Hewitt, J M Meyer, J Silberg, M C Neale, N G Martin, K S Kendler.   

Abstract

The "Virginia 30,000" comprise 29,698 subjects from the extended kinships of 5670 twin pairs. Over 80 unique correlations between relatives can be derived from these kinships, comprised of monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins and their spouses, parents, siblings, and children. This paper describes the first application of a fairly general model for family resemblance to data from the Virginia 30,000. The model assesses the contributions of additive and dominant genetic effects in the presence of vertical cultural inheritance, phenotypic assortative mating, shared twin and sibling environments, and within-family environment. The genetic and environmental effects can be dependent on sex. Assortment and cultural inheritance may be based either on the phenotype as measured or on a latent trait of which the measured phenotype is an unreliable index. The model was applied to church attendance data from this study. The results show that the contributions of genes, vertical cultural inheritance, and genotype-environment covariance are all important, but their contributions are significantly heterogeneous over sexes. Phenotypic assortative mating has a major impact on family resemblance in church attendance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8192619     DOI: 10.1007/bf01067927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  14 in total

1.  The multiple abstract variance analysis equations and solutions: for nature-nurture research on continuous variables.

Authors:  R B CATTELL
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1960-11       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  A model for sibling effects in man.

Authors:  L Eaves
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 3.  Model-fitting approaches to the analysis of human behaviour.

Authors:  L J Eaves; K A Last; P A Young; N G Martin
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Models for cultural inheritance. I. Group mean and within group variation.

Authors:  L Cavalli-Sforza; M W Feldman
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 1.570

5.  Analysis of family resemblance. I. Introduction.

Authors:  N E Morton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Cultural versus biological inheritance: phenotypic transmission from parents to children. (A theory of the effect of parental phenotypes on children's phenotypes).

Authors:  L L Cavalli-Sforza; M W Feldman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Comparison of the biometrical genetical, MAVA, and classical approaches to the analysis of human behavior.

Authors:  J L Jinks; D W Fulker
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Evaluation of path analysis through computer simulation: effect of incorrectly assuming independent distribution of familial correlations.

Authors:  M McGue; R Wette; D C Rao
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.135

9.  The resolution of cultural and biological inheritance: informativeness of different relationships.

Authors:  A C Heath; K S Kendler; L J Eaves; D Markell
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.805

10.  Multifactorial inheritance with cultural transmission and assortative mating. I. Description and basic properties of the unitary models.

Authors:  J Rice; C R Cloninger; T Reich
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  27 in total

1.  Genetic and environmental effects on type A scores in monozygotic twin families.

Authors:  K Tambs; J M Sundet; L Eaves; K Berg
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.805

2.  A Children of Twins Study of parental divorce and offspring psychopathology.

Authors:  Brian M D'Onofrio; Eric Turkheimer; Robert E Emery; Hermine H Maes; Judy Silberg; Lindon J Eaves
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 8.982

3.  Genetic influences on political ideologies: twin analyses of 19 measures of political ideologies from five democracies and genome-wide findings from three populations.

Authors:  Peter K Hatemi; Sarah E Medland; Robert Klemmensen; Sven Oskarsson; Levente Littvay; Christopher T Dawes; Brad Verhulst; Rose McDermott; Asbjørn Sonne Nørgaard; Casey A Klofstad; Kaare Christensen; Magnus Johannesson; Patrik K E Magnusson; Lindon J Eaves; Nicholas G Martin
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  The Augmented Classical Twin Design: Incorporating Genome-Wide Identity by Descent Sharing Into Twin Studies in Order to Model Violations of the Equal Environments Assumption.

Authors:  Liang-Dar Hwang; Brittany L Mitchell; Sarah E Medland; Nicholas G Martin; Michael C Neale; David M Evans
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 2.805

5.  Notes on Three Decades of Methodology Workshops.

Authors:  Hermine H Maes
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 2.805

6.  Differences between White and Black young women in the relationship between religious service attendance and alcohol involvement.

Authors:  Arpana Agrawal; Julia D Grant; Jon Randolph Haber; Pamela A F Madden; Andrew C Heath; Kathleen K Bucholz; Carolyn E Sartor
Journal:  Am J Addict       Date:  2016-10-17

7.  Are extended twin family designs worth the trouble? A comparison of the bias, precision, and accuracy of parameters estimated in four twin family models.

Authors:  Matthew C Keller; Sarah E Medland; Laramie E Duncan
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.805

8.  The cross-generational mother-daughter-aunt-niece design: establishing validity of the MDAN design with NLSY fertility variables.

Authors:  Joseph Lee Rodgers; David E Bard; Amber Johnson; Brian D'Onofrio; Warren B Miller
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 2.805

9.  Males do not reduce the fitness of their female co-twins in contemporary samples.

Authors:  Sarah E Medland; John C Loehlin; Gonneke Willemsen; Peter K Hatemi; Mathew C Keller; Dorret I Boomsma; Lindon J Eaves; Nicholas G Martin
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.587

Review 10.  Modeling extended twin family data I: description of the Cascade model.

Authors:  Matthew C Keller; Sarah E Medland; Laramie E Duncan; Peter K Hatemi; Michael C Neale; Hermine H M Maes; Lindon J Eaves
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.587

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.