Literature DB >> 8192298

Some problems in applying evidence in clinical practice.

R B Haynes1.   

Abstract

There is a considerable gap between sound evidence concerning health care interventions and the services that patients actually receive as health care. Practitioners and the health care system must overcome a number of barriers to narrow the gap. Viewed simplistically, there are three steps from evidence to practice: getting the evidence straight; developing clinical practice guidelines that are faithful to both the evidence and the clinical and personal situations of patients; and applying these guidelines to the right patient at the right time in the right way. Special problems in getting the evidence straight stem from difficulties in finding sound evidence. Lack of agreement on evidence standards undermine the effectiveness of authoritative practice guidelines. Applying evidence and practice guidelines effectively and efficiently is often thwarted by mismatches between evidence and usual practice circumstances. Time pressures undermine interpretation and application of evidence at every step. Understanding these problems may permit development of more effective strategies to bridge the gap between evidence and practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8192298     DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26350.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  15 in total

1.  Reporting and concordance of methodologic criteria between abstracts and articles in diagnostic test studies.

Authors:  C A Estrada; R M Bloch; D Antonacci; L L Basnight; S R Patel; S C Patel; W Wiese
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  An information retrieval service to support clinical decision-making at the point of care.

Authors:  F Sullivan; M Gardner; K van Rijsbergen
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  ActiveGuidelines: integrating Web-based guidelines with computer-based patient records.

Authors:  P C Tang; C Y Young
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

4.  [Perspectives in guideline development and implementation in Germany].

Authors:  I B Kopp
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.372

5.  [Principles of the developmental process and implementation of guidelines. An update].

Authors:  I Kopp
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Communication about risk--dilemmas for general practitioners. The Department of General Practice Working Group, University of Wales College of Medicine.

Authors:  A Edwards; L Prior
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 7.  Evidence-based medicine and general practice.

Authors:  L D Jacobson; A G Edwards; S K Granier; C C Butler
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Evidence-based care: 5. Lifelong learning: how can we learn to be more effective? Evidence-Based Care Resource Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-06-15       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Quality of service provision for anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation. Bridges from evidence to practice are fragile.

Authors:  A Edwards; R Pill
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-01-06

10.  Type 2 diabetes in family practice. Room for improvement.

Authors:  Stewart B Harris; Moira Stewart; Judith Belle Brown; Stephen Wetmore; Catherine Faulds; Susan Webster-Bogaert; Sheila Porter
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.275

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.