Literature DB >> 18972093

[Principles of the developmental process and implementation of guidelines. An update].

I Kopp1.   

Abstract

Guidelines are important tools to improve knowledge management, processes and outcomes in health care. Their function is to assist professionals and patients decisions about appropriate and effective practice, especially in those areas of health care where considerable variation or potential for improvement exists. The achievement of a favourable impact necessitates both a systematic and methodically sound approach in the development of guidelines. The German Instrument for Methodological Guideline Appraisal, an adopted and supplemented version of the AGREE (Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation) instrument, provides 34 quality criteria guideline developers should take into account. However, the impact of guidelines is not only determined by methodological soundness but also by the choice of the guideline topic (need for a guideline), by its dissemination (accessibility) and implementation (acceptance and use). Finally, this impact must be monitored by means of guideline-based quality indicators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18972093     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-008-1780-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  14 in total

Review 1.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.

Authors:  M D Cabana; C S Rand; N R Powe; A W Wu; M H Wilson; P A Abboud; H R Rubin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  [Assessment of methodological quality of clinical performance measures].

Authors:  Max Geraedts; Hans-Konrad Selbmann; Günter Ollenschläger
Journal:  Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich       Date:  2002-02

3.  Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project.

Authors: 
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-02

4.  Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

Authors:  David Atkins; Dana Best; Peter A Briss; Martin Eccles; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Signe Flottorp; Gordon H Guyatt; Robin T Harbour; Margaret C Haugh; David Henry; Suzanne Hill; Roman Jaeschke; Gillian Leng; Alessandro Liberati; Nicola Magrini; James Mason; Philippa Middleton; Jacek Mrukowicz; Dianne O'Connell; Andrew D Oxman; Bob Phillips; Holger J Schünemann; Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer; Helena Varonen; Gunn E Vist; John W Williams; Stephanie Zaza
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-06-19

5.  Algorithm based improvement of clinical quality.

Authors:  S C Schoenbaum; L K Gottlieb
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-12-15

6.  Improving the quality of health care: using international collaboration to inform guideline programmes by founding the Guidelines International Network (G-I-N).

Authors:  G Ollenschläger; C Marshall; S Qureshi; K Rosenbrand; J Burgers; M Mäkelä; J Slutsky
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-12

7.  Evidence-based medicine and its role in ethical decision-making.

Authors:  Pascal Borry; Paul Schotsmans; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.431

8.  [Clinical guidelines. What do doctors and patients get from them].

Authors:  M Lelgemann; B Lang; R Kunz; G Antes
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 9.  Some problems in applying evidence in clinical practice.

Authors:  R B Haynes
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1993-12-31       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  [Consensus development in evidence-based guidelines: from myths to rational strategies].

Authors:  Ina B Kopp; Hans-Konrad Selbmann; Michael Koller
Journal:  Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich       Date:  2007
View more
  3 in total

1.  [Perspectives in guideline development and implementation in Germany].

Authors:  I B Kopp
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.372

2.  [The concept of the development of S3 guidelines: additional benefit compared to traditional standards, problems and solutions].

Authors:  A Pfennig; I Kopp; D Strech; M Bauer
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  [Methodology and process of developing the S3 guideline for prostate cancer].

Authors:  M Nothacker; C Röllig; A Wöckel; I Kopp; G Ollenschläger; S Weinbrenner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 0.639

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.