Literature DB >> 8192293

The Cochrane collaboration: preparing, maintaining, and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care.

I Chalmers1.   

Abstract

In an influential book published more than twenty years ago, Archie Cochrane drew attention to our great collective ignorance about the effects of health care, and explained how evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) could help us to use resources more rationally. He recognized that people who want to take more informed decisions about health care do not have ready access to reliable reviews of the available evidence. In 1979, he wrote: "It is surely a great criticism of our profession that we have not organised a critical summary, by specialty or subspecialty, adapted periodically, of all relevant randomised controlled trials." The Cochrane Collaboration has evolved in response to this challenge and will eventually cover all areas of health care. Contributors in many countries and specialties are preparing and maintaining systematic reviews of RCTs, and reviews of other evidence when appropriate. These reviews will be disseminated using electronic media through the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8192293     DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26345.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  81 in total

1.  Review of randomised controlled trials of traditional Chinese medicine.

Authors:  J L Tang; S Y Zhan; E Ernst
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-07-17

2.  Design and implementation of a national clinical trials registry.

Authors:  A T McCray; N C Ide
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Evidence-based medicine and quality of care.

Authors:  Donna Dickenson; Paolo Vineis
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2002

4.  Identification and analysis of randomised controlled trials in nursing: a preliminary study.

Authors:  N Cullum
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1997-03

Review 5.  A systematic review evaluating the methodological aspects of meta-analyses of genetic association studies in cancer research.

Authors:  Stefania Boccia; Emma De Feo; Paola Gallì; Francesco Gianfagna; Rosarita Amore; Gualtiero Ricciardi
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  Steroids in ARDS: to be or not to be.

Authors:  Shailesh Bihari; Michael Bailey; Andrew D Bersten
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  A call for systematic reviews.

Authors:  Victor M Montori; Somnath Saha; Mike Clarke
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Searching for clinical evidence in CiteSpace.

Authors:  Chaomei Chen; Yunan Chen
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

9.  Rapid network meta-analysis using data from Food and Drug Administration approval packages is feasible but with limitations.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Benjamin Rouse; Arielle Marks-Anglin; Rui Duan; Qiyuan Shi; Kevin Quach; Yong Chen; Christopher Cameron; Christopher H Schmid; Tianjing Li
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  Educating osteopaths to be researchers - what role should research methods and statistics have in an undergraduate curriculum?

Authors:  John C Licciardone
Journal:  Int J Osteopath Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.149

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.