Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 A call for systematic reviews.

Literature DB >> 15610335

A call for systematic reviews.

Victor M Montori, Somnath Saha, Mike Clarke.

Abstract

Mesh：

Year: 2004 PMID： 15610335 PMCID： PMC1492593 DOI： 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.41001.x

Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Gen Intern Med ISSN： 0884-8734 Impact factor: 5.128

× No keyword cloud information.

14 in total

Review 1. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses.

Authors: D Moher; D J Cook; S Eastwood; I Olkin; D Rennie; D F Stroup
Journal: Lancet Date: 1999-11-27 Impact factor: 79.321

2. Quality-assessed reviews of health care interventions and the database of abstracts of reviews of effectiveness (DARE). NHS CRD Review, Dissemination, and Information Teams.

Authors: M Petticrew; F Song; P Wilson; K Wright
Journal: Int J Technol Assess Health Care Date: 1999 Impact factor: 2.188

3. The medical review article revisited: has the science improved?

Authors: F A McAlister; H D Clark; C van Walraven; S E Straus; F M Lawson; D Moher; C D Mulrow
Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1999-12-21 Impact factor: 25.391

4. A brief history of research synthesis.

Authors: Iain Chalmers; Larry V Hedges; Harris Cooper
Journal: Eval Health Prof Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 2.651

5. A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction.

Authors: E M Antman; J Lau; B Kupelnick; F Mosteller; T C Chalmers
Journal: JAMA Date: 1992-07-08 Impact factor: 56.272

6. Validation of an index of the quality of review articles.

Authors: A D Oxman; G H Guyatt
Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 1991 Impact factor: 6.437

7. Selection of patients for randomized controlled trials: implications of wide or narrow eligibility criteria.

Authors: S Yusuf; P Held; K K Teo; E R Toretsky
Journal: Stat Med Date: 1990 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.373

8. Why do we need some large, simple randomized trials?

Authors: S Yusuf; R Collins; R Peto
Journal: Stat Med Date: 1984 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 2.373

Review 9. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group.

Authors: D F Stroup; J A Berlin; S C Morton; I Olkin; G D Williamson; D Rennie; D Moher; B J Becker; T A Sipe; S B Thacker
Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-04-19 Impact factor: 56.272

A call for systematic reviews.

Review 1. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses.

2. Quality-assessed reviews of health care interventions and the database of abstracts of reviews of effectiveness (DARE). NHS CRD Review, Dissemination, and Information Teams.

3. The medical review article revisited: has the science improved?

4. A brief history of research synthesis.

5. A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction.

6. Validation of an index of the quality of review articles.

7. Selection of patients for randomized controlled trials: implications of wide or narrow eligibility criteria.

8. Why do we need some large, simple randomized trials?

Review 9. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group.

10. Systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of location and citation counts.

1. Five years before the masthead: our journey with the Journal of General Internal Medicine.

Review 2. Bariatric surgery for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in obese patients.

3. DEALING WITH DISASTER DATABASES - WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM HEALTH AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS?: Application in practice.

4. Appraisal of systematic reviews on interventions for postpartum depression: systematic review.