PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of silk suture as an agent for preoperative embolization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. METHODS: Clinical and histopathologic results were analyzed in six patients who underwent embolization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations using silk suture in combination with other agents. RESULTS: Three of the patients treated with silk hemorrhaged after embolization, and two of these patients died. Neuropathologic analysis of four patients showed acute perivascular inflammation, sometimes quite severe. CONCLUSIONS: The inflammatory response to silk may explain its effectiveness in producing vascular occlusion. However, a fulminate vasculitis theoretically can predispose to delayed hemorrhage. Other problems with silk include the pressure required to inject the agent and the inability to determine the final site of deposition of the silk. Although other embolic agents may share some of these potential difficulties, we feel that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages of silk as an embolic agent.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of silk suture as an agent for preoperative embolization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. METHODS: Clinical and histopathologic results were analyzed in six patients who underwent embolization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations using silk suture in combination with other agents. RESULTS: Three of the patients treated with silk hemorrhaged after embolization, and two of these patients died. Neuropathologic analysis of four patients showed acute perivascular inflammation, sometimes quite severe. CONCLUSIONS: The inflammatory response to silk may explain its effectiveness in producing vascular occlusion. However, a fulminate vasculitis theoretically can predispose to delayed hemorrhage. Other problems with silk include the pressure required to inject the agent and the inability to determine the final site of deposition of the silk. Although other embolic agents may share some of these potential difficulties, we feel that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages of silk as an embolic agent.
Authors: R Shane Tubbs; Ketan Verma; Sheryl Riech; Martin Mortazavi; W Jerry Oakes; Aaron A Cohen-Gadol Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2010-11-16 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Shixuan Chen; Liangpeng Ge; Aubrey Mueller; Mark A Carlson; Matthew J Teusink; Franklin D Shuler; Jingwei Xie Journal: Nanomedicine Date: 2017-02-06 Impact factor: 5.307
Authors: J Talan-Hranilović; T Rumboldt; M Vucic; Z Rumboldt; V Beros; V Tonković; V Lupret Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2004-10-22 Impact factor: 1.610
Authors: A Kurata; S Suzuki; H Ozawa; I Yuzawa; M Yamda; K Fujii; S Kan; T Kitahara; T Ohmomo; Y Miyasaka Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2005-10-26 Impact factor: 1.610
Authors: M Al-Yamany; K G Terbrugge; R Willinsky; W Montanera; M Tymianski; M C Wallace Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2001-05-15 Impact factor: 1.610
Authors: J O Heidenreich; S Hartlieb; R Stendel; T A Pietilä; P Schlattmann; K-J Wolf; A M Schilling Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Shuko Suzuki; Rebecca A Dawson; Traian V Chirila; Audra M A Shadforth; Thomas A Hogerheyde; Grant A Edwards; Damien G Harkin Journal: J Funct Biomater Date: 2015-05-29