Literature DB >> 8187941

A comparison of azelastine nasal spray and cetirizine tablets in the treatment of allergic rhinitis.

D Passali1, F Piragine.   

Abstract

A total of 40 patients with perennial allergic rhinitis were treated with either azelastine nasal spray 0.14 mg/nostril twice daily (0.56 mg/day) or cetirizine tablets 10 mg once daily. Treatment was for a period of eight weeks. The rhinitis symptoms were evaluated according to a four-point scale (0 = absent, 3 = severe). The Total Rhinitis Symptom Score (TRSS) was derived from the sum of the individual symptom scores. Symptoms were assessed at baseline prior to treatment and at weeks 2, 4 and 8. Compared baseline, TRSS for both the azelastine and cetirizine groups were less at each assessment during treatment, a slight non-significant advantage was seen in the azelastine group. At the end of the study, physicians rated global efficacy as being "good" or "excellent" in 73.7% of azelastine patients and 55.5% of cetirizine patients. Both treatments were well tolerated and no serious adverse events were reported, however, two cetirizine patients withdrew from the study because of somnolence. In conclusion, azelastine has been shown to be at least as effective as cetirizine in the relief of the symptoms of perennial allergic rhinitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8187941     DOI: 10.1177/030006059402200102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Med Res        ISSN: 0300-0605            Impact factor:   1.671


  5 in total

Review 1.  Intranasal corticosteroids for allergic rhinitis: superior relief?

Authors:  L P Nielsen; N Mygind; R Dahl
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Safety and tolerability profiles of intranasal antihistamines and intranasal corticosteroids in the treatment of allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Rami Jean Salib; Peter Hugo Howarth
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis.

Authors:  Sarah K Wise; Sandra Y Lin; Elina Toskala; Richard R Orlandi; Cezmi A Akdis; Jeremiah A Alt; Antoine Azar; Fuad M Baroody; Claus Bachert; G Walter Canonica; Thomas Chacko; Cemal Cingi; Giorgio Ciprandi; Jacquelynne Corey; Linda S Cox; Peter Socrates Creticos; Adnan Custovic; Cecelia Damask; Adam DeConde; John M DelGaudio; Charles S Ebert; Jean Anderson Eloy; Carrie E Flanagan; Wytske J Fokkens; Christine Franzese; Jan Gosepath; Ashleigh Halderman; Robert G Hamilton; Hans Jürgen Hoffman; Jens M Hohlfeld; Steven M Houser; Peter H Hwang; Cristoforo Incorvaia; Deborah Jarvis; Ayesha N Khalid; Maritta Kilpeläinen; Todd T Kingdom; Helene Krouse; Desiree Larenas-Linnemann; Adrienne M Laury; Stella E Lee; Joshua M Levy; Amber U Luong; Bradley F Marple; Edward D McCoul; K Christopher McMains; Erik Melén; James W Mims; Gianna Moscato; Joaquim Mullol; Harold S Nelson; Monica Patadia; Ruby Pawankar; Oliver Pfaar; Michael P Platt; William Reisacher; Carmen Rondón; Luke Rudmik; Matthew Ryan; Joaquin Sastre; Rodney J Schlosser; Russell A Settipane; Hemant P Sharma; Aziz Sheikh; Timothy L Smith; Pongsakorn Tantilipikorn; Jody R Tversky; Maria C Veling; De Yun Wang; Marit Westman; Magnus Wickman; Mark Zacharek
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.858

4.  A multicenter clinical study of the efficacy and tolerability of azelastine nasal spray in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis: a comparison with oral cetirizine.

Authors:  D Charpin; P Godard; R P Garay; M Baehre; D Herman; F B Michel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 5.  Intranasal azelastine. A review of its efficacy in the management of allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  W McNeely; L R Wiseman
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 9.546

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.