STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the ability of laypeople to apply basic CPR techniques after recent training. DESIGN: Cross-sectional assessment of practical CPR skills. TYPE OF PARTICIPANTS: 151 laypeople who were trained twice in the preceding 20 to 24 months. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Practical skills were tested using six primary recorded variables that describe the quality of CPR techniques in a training situation. A total score on the skills of each participant was computed on the basis of a predefined scoring system. Thirty-three percent of the participants were able to perform adequate CPR. The compression:relaxation ratio, the breathing volume, and the breathing interval were points of concern. CONCLUSION: Practical skills in basic CPR after a 12-month training interval, though better in this study than in many previous studies, are insufficient in the majority of laypeople. The results of this study could be used to design a better tailored (re)instruction program, with an emphasis on regular, frequent refresher courses.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the ability of laypeople to apply basic CPR techniques after recent training. DESIGN: Cross-sectional assessment of practical CPR skills. TYPE OF PARTICIPANTS: 151 laypeople who were trained twice in the preceding 20 to 24 months. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Practical skills were tested using six primary recorded variables that describe the quality of CPR techniques in a training situation. A total score on the skills of each participant was computed on the basis of a predefined scoring system. Thirty-three percent of the participants were able to perform adequate CPR. The compression:relaxation ratio, the breathing volume, and the breathing interval were points of concern. CONCLUSION: Practical skills in basic CPR after a 12-month training interval, though better in this study than in many previous studies, are insufficient in the majority of laypeople. The results of this study could be used to design a better tailored (re)instruction program, with an emphasis on regular, frequent refresher courses.
Authors: Jochen Hinkelbein; Lennert Böhm; Stefan Braunecker; Harald V Genzwürker; Steffen Kalina; Fabrizio Cirillo; Matthieu Komorowski; Andreas Hohn; Jörg Siedenburg; Michael Bernhard; Ilse Janicke; Christoph Adler; Stefanie Jansen; Eckard Glaser; Pawel Krawczyk; Mirko Miesen; Janusz Andres; Edoardo De Robertis; Christopher Neuhaus Journal: Intern Emerg Med Date: 2018-05-05 Impact factor: 3.397
Authors: Jim Christenson; Sarah Nafziger; Scott Compton; Kris Vijayaraghavan; Brian Slater; Robert Ledingham; Judy Powell; Mary Ann McBurnie Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2007-02-14 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Johan Creutzfeldt; Leif Hedman; Christopher Medin; Wm LeRoy Heinrichs; Li Felländer-Tsai Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2010-09-03 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Karl Kuckuck; Hanna Schröder; Rolf Rossaint; Lina Stieger; Stefan K Beckers; Sasa Sopka Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-02-22 Impact factor: 2.692