BACKGROUND: Healthcare professionals are expected to have knowledge of current basic and advanced cardiac life support (BLS/ACLS) guidelines to revive unresponsive patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate the current practices and knowledge of BLS/ACLS principles among healthcare professionals of North-Kerala using pretested self-administered structured questionnaire. Answers were validated in accordance with American Heart Association's BLS/ACLS teaching manual and the results were analysed. RESULTS: Among 461 healthcare professionals, 141 (30.6%) were practicing physicians, 268 (58.1%) were nurses and 52 (11.3%) supporting staff. The maximum achievable score was 20 (BLS 15/ACLS 5). The mean score amongst all healthcare professionals was 8.9±4.7. The mean score among physicians, nurses and support staff were 8.6±3.4, 9±3.6 and 9±3.3 respectively. The majority of healthcare professionals scored ≤50% (237, 51.4%); 204 (44.3%) scored 51%-80% and 20 (4.34%) scored >80%. Mean scores decreased with age, male sex and across occupation. Nurses who underwent BLS/ACLS training previously had significantly higher mean scores (10.2±3.4) than untrained (8.2±3.6, P=0.001). Physicians with <5 years experience (P=0.002) and nurses in the private sector (P=0.003) had significantly higher scores. One hundred and sixty three (35.3%) healthcare professionals knew the correct airway opening manoeuvres like head tilt, chin lift and jaw thrust. Only 54 (11.7%) respondents were aware that atropine is not used in ACLS for cardiac arrest resuscitation and 79 (17.1%) correctly opted ventricular fibrillation and pulseless ventricular tachycardia as shockable rhythms. The majority of healthcare professionals (356, 77.2%) suggested that BLS/ACLS be included in academic curriculum. CONCLUSION: Inadequate knowledge of BLS/ACLS principles amongst healthcare professionals, especially physicians, illuminate lacunae in existing training systems and merit urgent redressal.
BACKGROUND: Healthcare professionals are expected to have knowledge of current basic and advanced cardiac life support (BLS/ACLS) guidelines to revive unresponsive patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate the current practices and knowledge of BLS/ACLS principles among healthcare professionals of North-Kerala using pretested self-administered structured questionnaire. Answers were validated in accordance with American Heart Association's BLS/ACLS teaching manual and the results were analysed. RESULTS: Among 461 healthcare professionals, 141 (30.6%) were practicing physicians, 268 (58.1%) were nurses and 52 (11.3%) supporting staff. The maximum achievable score was 20 (BLS 15/ACLS 5). The mean score amongst all healthcare professionals was 8.9±4.7. The mean score among physicians, nurses and support staff were 8.6±3.4, 9±3.6 and 9±3.3 respectively. The majority of healthcare professionals scored ≤50% (237, 51.4%); 204 (44.3%) scored 51%-80% and 20 (4.34%) scored >80%. Mean scores decreased with age, male sex and across occupation. Nurses who underwent BLS/ACLS training previously had significantly higher mean scores (10.2±3.4) than untrained (8.2±3.6, P=0.001). Physicians with <5 years experience (P=0.002) and nurses in the private sector (P=0.003) had significantly higher scores. One hundred and sixty three (35.3%) healthcare professionals knew the correct airway opening manoeuvres like head tilt, chin lift and jaw thrust. Only 54 (11.7%) respondents were aware that atropine is not used in ACLS for cardiac arrest resuscitation and 79 (17.1%) correctly opted ventricular fibrillation and pulseless ventricular tachycardia as shockable rhythms. The majority of healthcare professionals (356, 77.2%) suggested that BLS/ACLS be included in academic curriculum. CONCLUSION: Inadequate knowledge of BLS/ACLS principles amongst healthcare professionals, especially physicians, illuminate lacunae in existing training systems and merit urgent redressal.
Entities:
Keywords:
Advanced cardiac life support; Awareness; Basic life support; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Healthcare professionals
Authors: Sandro Gonçalves de Lima; Larissa Araripe de Macedo; Marcela de Lima Vidal; Michel Pompeu Barros de Oliveira Sá Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: John M Field; Mary Fran Hazinski; Michael R Sayre; Leon Chameides; Stephen M Schexnayder; Robin Hemphill; Ricardo A Samson; John Kattwinkel; Robert A Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Diana M Cave; Edward C Jauch; Peter J Kudenchuk; Robert W Neumar; Mary Ann Peberdy; Jeffrey M Perlman; Elizabeth Sinz; Andrew H Travers; Marc D Berg; John E Billi; Brian Eigel; Robert W Hickey; Monica E Kleinman; Mark S Link; Laurie J Morrison; Robert E O'Connor; Michael Shuster; Clifton W Callaway; Brett Cucchiara; Jeffrey D Ferguson; Thomas D Rea; Terry L Vanden Hoek Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-11-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Nedungalaparambil Nisanth Menon; Raman Kumar; Pratyush Kumar; Pramendra Prasad Gupta; Victor Ng; Elena Klusova Noguiná; Jobin Jose Maprani Journal: J Family Med Prim Care Date: 2020-12-31
Authors: Babar Irfan; Ibrahim Zahid; Muhammad Sharjeel Khan; Omar Abdul Aziz Khan; Shayan Zaidi; Safia Awan; Sobia Bilal; Omar Irfan Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2019-11-21 Impact factor: 2.655