Literature DB >> 8184559

Recovery from motion adaptation is delayed by successively presented orthogonal motion.

F A Verstraten1, R E Fredericksen, O J Grüsser, W A van de Grind.   

Abstract

Following a period of adaptation to a pattern moving in a particular direction, a subsequently viewed stationary pattern appears to move in the opposite direction for some time: the movement after effect (MAE). The MAE lasts longer when the test pattern is not immediately or not continuously presented after adaptation. This phenomenon is called storage. So far research indicates that storage only occurs when textured visual stimulation is absent during part of the test phase or if the processing of a stationary test stimulus is prevented (e.g. by binocular rivalry). We present evidence that storage-like phenomena can occur even while a textured and moving visual stimulus is phenomenally present. We adapted binocularly to uni-directional motion of a random-pixel array M1 for 60 sec. This stimulus was immediately followed by another moving pattern M2. Its motion direction was orthogonal to that of M1. The presentation time of M2 was the independent variable. A stationary pattern was presented immediately after presentation of M2. The direction of the resulting integrated uni-directional MAE was measured. For short presentation times of M2 there is an integrated uni-directional MAE, which shows an interaction of the output of units stimulated by both moving patterns. However, it appeared that the effect of M1 on the direction of this combined uni-directional MAE is much longer present than would be expected from the MAE duration of M1, when tested in isolation.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8184559     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90297-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  7 in total

1.  Different time scales of motion integration for anticipatory smooth pursuit and perceptual adaptation.

Authors:  Gerrit W Maus; Elena Potapchuk; Scott N J Watamaniuk; Stephen J Heinen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Experience-driven plasticity in binocular vision.

Authors:  P Christiaan Klink; Jan W Brascamp; Randolph Blake; Richard J A van Wezel
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Afternystagmus in darkness after suppression of optokinetic nystagmus: an interaction of motion aftereffect and retinal afterimages.

Authors:  Chien-Cheng Chen; Melody Ying-Yu Huang; Konrad P Weber; Dominik Straumann; Christopher J Bockisch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Storage of an oculomotor motion aftereffect.

Authors:  Scott N J Watamaniuk; Stephen J Heinen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  A population decoding framework for motion aftereffects on smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Justin L Gardner; Stefanie N Tokiyama; Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Mentalizing Another's Visual World-A Novel Exploration via Motion Aftereffect.

Authors:  Xuefei Yuan; Nanbo Wang; Haiyan Geng; Shen Zhang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-09-07

7.  Humans adapt their anticipatory eye movements to the volatility of visual motion properties.

Authors:  Chloé Pasturel; Anna Montagnini; Laurent Udo Perrinet
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 4.475

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.