Literature DB >> 8178793

Nonresponse pattern and bias in a community-based cross-sectional study of cognitive functioning among the elderly.

L J Launer1, A W Wind, D J Deeg.   

Abstract

The demographic, health, and mental functioning characteristics of nonresponders to a community-based cross-sectional study of cognitive functioning among the elderly in Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Amsterdam Study of the Elderly (AMSTEL), October 1990 to May 1991), were examined and compared with responders. The randomly selected age-stratified (65-74, 75-84 years) sample was drawn from nonresponders listed with a subsample (n = 8) of general practitioners whose lists served as the sampling frame for the main study. The general practitioners approached and interviewed the responding nonresponders using the same standardized questions that were used in the main study. Nonresponders (n = 115) and responders (n = 999) from the same medical practices were compared by means of chi-square and odds ratios. Compared with responders, these nonresponders more often reported a history of psychiatric illness, heart attack, stroke, and diabetes, and were more likely to be unmarried, to have a lower education, and to do poorly on the cognitive test (odds ratio = 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.0-2.6). Most significant physical and mental health differences by response status were seen among the persons aged < 75 years and not among those aged > or = 75 years. The odds for poor cognitive test performance associated with age and stroke were relatively more biased than those associated with other risk factors. These results suggest that the characteristics of young-old and old-old elderly nonresponders to cross-sectional studies of cognitive function may differ, and that there may be selective nonresponse that could bias, to a different degree, estimates of risk for poor cognitive functioning. Studies should investigate the possibilities for nonresponse in their own setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8178793     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  36 in total

1.  Subgroups of refusers in a disability prevention trial in older adults: baseline and follow-up analysis.

Authors:  Christoph E Minder; Tobias Müller; Gerhard Gillmann; John C Beck; Andreas E Stuck
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  National health surveys by mail or home interview: effects on response.

Authors:  H S Picavet
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Incidence of dementia among participants and nonparticipants in a longitudinal study of cognitive aging.

Authors:  David S Knopman; Rosebud O Roberts; V Shane Pankratz; Ruth H Cha; Walter A Rocca; Michelle M Mielke; Bradley F Boeve; Eric G Tangalos; Robert J Ivnik; Yonas E Geda; Ronald C Petersen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Responders versus nonresponders in a dementia study of the oldest old: the 90+ study.

Authors:  Annlia Paganini-Hill; Beverly Ducey; Marian Hawk
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-04-07       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  A demonstration of the impact of response bias on the results of patient satisfaction surveys.

Authors:  Kathleen M Mazor; Brian E Clauser; Terry Field; Robert A Yood; Jerry H Gurwitz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Midlife vascular risk factors and Alzheimer's disease in later life: longitudinal, population based study.

Authors:  M Kivipelto; E L Helkala; M P Laakso; T Hänninen; M Hallikainen; K Alhainen; H Soininen; J Tuomilehto; A Nissinen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-16

7.  Risk screening in a medicare/medicaid population administrative data versus self report.

Authors:  C L Vojta; D D Vojta; T R TenHave; M Amaya; R Lavizzo-Mourey; D A Asch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Are cognitively impaired individuals adequately represented in community surveys? Recruitment challenges and strategies to facilitate participation in community surveys of older adults. A review.

Authors:  S G Riedel-Heller; A Busse; M C Angermeyer
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 8.082

9.  Comparison of ankle-brachial pressure index and pulse wave velocity as markers of cognitive function in a community-dwelling population.

Authors:  Norio Sugawara; Norio Yasui-Furukori; Takashi Umeda; Ayako Kaneda; Yasushi Sato; Ippei Takahashi; Masashi Matsuzaka; Kazuma Danjo; Shigeyuki Nakaji; Sunao Kaneko
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.630

10.  The male-female health-survival paradox: a survey and register study of the impact of sex-specific selection and information bias.

Authors:  Anna Oksuzyan; Inge Petersen; Henrik Stovring; Paul Bingley; James W Vaupel; Kaare Christensen
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 3.797

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.