Literature DB >> 8177883

Compensating changes in protein multiple sequence alignments.

W R Taylor1, K Hatrick.   

Abstract

A method was developed to identify compensating changes between residues at positions in a multiple sequence alignment. (For example, one position might always contain a positively charged residue when the other is negatively charged and vice versa.) A correlation-based method was used to measure the compensation found in the four residues at a pair of positions in any two sequences in a multiple alignment. All possible sequence pairings were measured at the pair of positions and the resulting matrix analysed to give a measure of cooperativity among the pairs. The basic method was sufficiently flexible to consider a number of amino acid relatedness models based both on scalar and vectorial properties. Pairs of compensating positions were selected by the method and their mean separation (in a protein of known structure) was compared to both the mean pairwise separation over all residues and the pairwise separation over an equivalent sample of pairs of residues selected on the basis of their conservation alone. The latter is an important control that has been omitted from previous studies. The results indicated that, at best, there was a slight effect (of marginal significance) leading to the selection of closer pairs by the compensation measure when compared to the mean of all pairs. However, this was never as good as the simpler measure based on conservation alone, which always found a significant majority of proteins with a sample mean less than the overall mean.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8177883     DOI: 10.1093/protein/7.3.341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Eng        ISSN: 0269-2139


  47 in total

Review 1.  Structural organization of G-protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  A L Lomize; I D Pogozheva; H I Mosberg
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Fold prediction of helical proteins using torsion angle dynamics and predicted restraints.

Authors:  Chao Zhang; Jingtong Hou; Sung-Hou Kim
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Use of residue pairs in protein sequence-sequence and sequence-structure alignments.

Authors:  J Jung; B Lee
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 4.  Genomic biodiversity, phylogenetics and coevolution in proteins.

Authors:  David D Pollock
Journal:  Appl Bioinformatics       Date:  2002

5.  FamClash: a method for ranking the activity of engineered enzymes.

Authors:  Manish C Saraf; Alexander R Horswill; Stephen J Benkovic; Costas D Maranas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Protein topology from predicted residue contacts.

Authors:  William R Taylor; David T Jones; Michael I Sadowski
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  From residue coevolution to protein conformational ensembles and functional dynamics.

Authors:  Ludovico Sutto; Simone Marsili; Alfonso Valencia; Francesco Luigi Gervasio
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Context dependence and coevolution among amino acid residues in proteins.

Authors:  Zhengyuan O Wang; David D Pollock
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.600

9.  Determination of network of residues that regulate allostery in protein families using sequence analysis.

Authors:  Ruxandra I Dima; D Thirumalai
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Coevolutionary patterns in cytochrome c oxidase subunit I depend on structural and functional context.

Authors:  Zhengyuan O Wang; David D Pollock
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.395

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.