Literature DB >> 8176348

A short survey for assessing health and social problems of adolescents. Dartmouth Primary Care Cooperative Information Project (The COOP).

J H Wasson1, S W Kairys, E C Nelson, N Kalishman, P Baribeau.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many significant problems of adolescents are undetected and untreated. To aid in the discovery of these problems, we have developed and tested picture-and-word charts for use in the classroom or the physician's office. This report presents the results of these tests and describes how the charts may be used.
METHODS: We assessed test-retest reliability of the picture-and-word charts. We also compared picture-and-word chart scores with corresponding multi-item questionnaires. Six charts were determined to be the most effective in measuring mutually exclusive dimensions of health and social problems. We used these six charts to examine factors that might affect the distribution of chart scores.
RESULTS: We administered the picture-and-word charts to a diverse population of 658 adolescents whose median age was 15 years. Compared with multi-item questionnaires, respondents found the charts easier to understand and less likely to induce dishonest replies. Girls scored significantly worse (P < .001) than boys on the Physical Fitness and Emotional Feelings charts but better on the (at-risk) Health Habits chart (P < .001). The scores of teenagers known to have behavioral problems were worse on the Health Habits chart than were those of other adolescents (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: The charts are an efficient and acceptable method for detecting health and social problems of adolescents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8176348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  10 in total

Review 1.  A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments.

Authors:  S J Coons; S Rao; D L Keininger; R D Hays
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  A review of measures of quality of life for children with chronic illness.

Authors:  C Eiser; R Morse
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Subjective fatigue in children with hearing loss: some preliminary findings.

Authors:  Benjamin W Y Hornsby; Krystal Werfel; Stephen Camarata; Fred H Bess
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.493

Review 4.  Measuring quality of life in paediatric patients.

Authors:  M A Connolly; J A Johnson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Use of the SF-12 instrument for measuring the health of homeless persons.

Authors:  Celia O Larson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Canadian-French, German and UK versions of the Child Health Questionnaire: methodology and preliminary item scaling results.

Authors:  J M Landgraf; E Maunsell; K N Speechley; M Bullinger; S Campbell; L Abetz; J E Ware
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Short Form 15 Generic Core Scales in Japan.

Authors:  Xiaoli Chen; Hideki Origasa; Fukiko Ichida; Keiko Kamibeppu; James W Varni
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-07-07       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 8.  Clinical approach to quality of life in children with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Min Hyun Cho
Journal:  Korean J Pediatr       Date:  2013-08-27

9.  An Analysis of the Educational and Health-Related Benefits of Nature-Based Environmental Education in Low-Income Black and Hispanic Children.

Authors:  Nadav Sprague; David Berrigan; Christine C Ekenga
Journal:  Health Equity       Date:  2020-05-18

10.  Systematic Review of Conceptual, Age, Measurement and Valuation Considerations for Generic Multidimensional Childhood Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Joseph Kwon; Louise Freijser; Julie Ratcliffe; Stavros Petrou; Elisabeth Huynh; Martin Howell; Gang Chen; Kamran Khan; Shahd Daher; Nia Roberts; Conrad Harrison; Sarah Smith; Nancy Devlin; Kirsten Howard; Emily Lancsar; Cate Bailey; Jonathan Craig; Kim Dalziel; Alison Hayes; Brendan Mulhern; Germaine Wong
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 4.558

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.