Literature DB >> 8175838

CT measurement of glenoid erosion in arthritis.

A B Mullaji1, F H Beddow, G H Lamb.   

Abstract

We studied serial CT scans of 45 arthritic shoulders (34 rheumatoid, 11 osteoarthritic) and 19 normal shoulders, making measurements at three levels on axial images. The maximum anteroposterior diameter of the glenoid was increased in rheumatoid glenoids at the upper and middle levels by 6 mm and in osteoarthritic glenoids at all levels by 5 to 8 mm as compared with normal. In rheumatoid cases, nearly half the available surface of the glenoid was of unsupported bone, mainly posteriorly at the upper and middle levels. In osteoarthritic glenoids, the best supported bone was anterior at the upper level and central at the middle and lower levels. The depth of the rheumatoid glenoid was reduced by a mean of 6 mm at the upper and middle levels and by 3 mm at the lower level. This inclined the surface of the glenoid superiorly. The depth at the middle level in osteoarthritis was reduced by a mean of 5 mm, suggesting central protrusion. Osteoarthritic glenoids were retroverted by a mean of 12.5 degrees, but of rheumatoid glenoids two-thirds were retroverted (mean 15.1 degrees) and one-third anteverted (mean 8.2 degrees). Our findings have important implications for the planning and placement of the glenoid component of total shoulder replacements; CT can provide useful information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8175838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  17 in total

1.  About the variability of the shape of the glenoid cavity.

Authors:  L F De Wilde; B M Berghs; E Audenaert; G Sys; G O Van Maele; E Barbaix
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2003-09-19       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Morphology of the normal and arthritic glenoid.

Authors:  Pierre Mansat; Nicolas Bonnevialle
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-10-31

3.  Bone destruction, upward migration, and medialisation of rheumatoid shoulder: a 15 year follow up study.

Authors:  J T Lehtinen; E A Belt; M J Kauppi; K Kaarela; P P Kuusela; H J Kautiainen; M U Lehto
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Biometrical analysis of the shoulder joint regarding glenoid implant dimensions for arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jörn Kircher; Bernd Bittersohl; Christoph Zilkens; Achim Hedtmann; Rüdiger Krauspe
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  How to deal with glenoid type B2 or C? How to prevent mistakes in implantation of glenoid component?

Authors:  Jean Kany; Denis Katz
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-11-02

Review 6.  Classifications of glenoid dysplasia, glenoid bone loss and glenoid loosening: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Kany Jean
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-11-04

Review 7.  [Rheumatoid shoulder: does minimally invasive therapy make sense?].

Authors:  A Kiekenbeck; M Preis; G Salzmann
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.372

8.  Quantitative assessment and characterization of glenoid bone loss in a spectrum of patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

Authors:  D J Lombardo; J Khan; B Prey; L Zhang; G R Petersen-Fitts; V J Sabesan
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-06-03

9.  Efficacy of anatomical prostheses in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Giovanni Merolla; Paolo Paladini; Fabrizio Campi; Giuseppe Porcellini
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2008-03-03

10.  Management of the subscapularis contracture during shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral arthritis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Fama; Pasquale Nava; Silvia Pini; Marina Mary Cossettini; Assunta Pozzuoli
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2008-03-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.