Literature DB >> 8175412

Rectal complications in patients with carcinoma of the cervix treated with concomitant cisplatin and external beam irradiation with high dose rate brachytherapy: a dosimetric analysis.

B G Clark1, L Souhami, T N Roman, M D Evans, C Pla.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This paper reports a dosimetric study of 43 patients treated with a combination of concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy (cisplatin) for locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix with the aim of investigating the correlation between the radiation dose to the rectum and the incidence of late rectal complications. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Radiotherapy consisted of 46 Gy external beam irradiation plus three high dose rate intracavitary treatments given weekly, concurrent with the last 3 weeks of external beam therapy, to a total dose of 30 Gy to point A. Cisplatin 30 mg/m2 was given weekly throughout the duration of the external beam irradiation. The brachytherapy irradiated volume was reconstructed from the orthogonal treatment radiographs to accurately locate the reference points defined by the International Commission of Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU), report 38. The doses calculated at these points were compared to in vivo dose measurements performed immediately prior to treatment.
RESULTS: The group of patients who were calculated to have received a dose to the rectal reference point greater than the prescribed point A dose (9/13) had a significantly greater probability of development of late rectal complications compared to the group of patients who were calculated to have received less than the prescribed point A dose at this rectal point (7/30), p = 0.003. There was no correlation of rate of complication with the in vivo measured dose in the rectum, stage of disease, or age. At 40 months post treatment, the group of patients receiving the higher dose to the rectal reference point had an actuarial rate of serious (Grade 3 and 4) rectal complications of 46% compared to a rate of 14% in the remainder. In terms of survival, the group of patients receiving the higher dose to the rectal reference point have all survived, whereas the group of patients receiving the lower dose to the rectal reference point have a significantly different rate of survival of 72%, p = 0.046.
CONCLUSION: This investigation has revealed a significant correlation between the dose calculated at the rectal point defined by the ICRU and the incidence of late rectal complications in patients with carcinoma of the cervix undergoing concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Thus, this rectal reference point appears to be a useful prognostic indicator of late rectal complications in these patients and we recommend that the brachytherapy dose delivered to this rectal point be limited to the dose prescribed to point A for treatment regimens using three fractions of 8-10 Gy each, limiting the total dose to this point, including the external beam component, to 76 Gy. Further study will be required to determine whether this rule should be applied to patients receiving irradiation alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8175412     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)90501-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  8 in total

1.  [Dosimetry methods in determining radiation dosage of the rectum in HDR-brachytherapy of cervix carcinoma].

Authors:  H T Eich; U Haverkamp; O Micke; F J Prott; R Pötter
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 2.  In vivo dosimetry: trends and prospects for brachytherapy.

Authors:  G Kertzscher; A Rosenfeld; S Beddar; K Tanderup; J E Cygler
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Radiochromic film dosimetry of rectal inhomogeneity and applicator attenuation in high dose rate brachytherapy of uterine cervix.

Authors:  Satish C Uniyal; Umesh C Naithani; Sunil D Sharma; Anoop K Srivastava
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Rectal dosimetry in intracavitary brachytherapy by HDR at rural center of Maharashtra: Comparison of two methods.

Authors:  Rajeev Shrivastava; Rahul B Umbarkar; M B Sarje; K K Singh
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2009-04

5.  Is there a role for an external beam boost in cervical cancer radiotherapy?

Authors:  Rajni A Sethi; Gabor Jozsef; David Grew; Ariel Marciscano; Ryan Pennell; Melissa Babcock; Allison McCarthy; John Curtin; Peter B Schiff
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Comparison of doses to the rectum derived from treatment planning system with in-vivo dose values in vaginal vault brachytherapy using cylinder applicators.

Authors:  Emmanuel Oyeyemi Oyekunle; Rachel Ibhade Obed; Bidemi Idayat Akinlade; Atara Ntekim
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2015-12-30

7.  Clinical analysis of speculum-based vaginal packing for high-dose-rate intracavitary tandem and ovoid brachytherapy in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Shivani Sud; Toni Roth; Ellen Jones
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2018-02-28

8.  Rectal and Bladder Dose Measurements in the Intracavitary Applications of Cervical Cancer Treatment with HDR Afterloading System: Comparison of TPS Data with MOSFET Detector.

Authors:  Singh N; Ahamed S; Sinha A; Srivastava S; Painuly N K; Mandal A; Prasad S N
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2020-04-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.