Literature DB >> 8172976

Wavelet compression and segmentation of digital mammograms.

B J Lucier1, M Kallergi, W Qian, R A DeVore, R A Clark, E B Saff, L P Clarke.   

Abstract

An initial evaluation of Haar wavelets is presented in this study for the compression of mammographic images. Fifteen mammograms with 105 microns/pixel resolution and varying dynamic range (10 and 12 bits per pixel) containing clustered microcalcifications were compressed with two different rates. The quality and content of the compressed reconstructed images was evaluated by an expert mammographer. The visualization of the cluster was on the average good but degraded with increasing compression because of the discontinuities introduced by these types of wavelets as the compression rate increases. However, the artifacts in the decoded images were seen as totally artificial and were not misinterpreted by the radiologist as calcifications. The classification of the parenchymal densities did not change significantly but the morphology of the calcifications was increasingly distorted as the compression rate increased leading to lower estimates of the suspiciousness of the cluster and higher uncertainties in the diagnosis. The uncompressed and two sets of compressed images were also processed by a wavelet method to extract the calcifications. Despite the fact that the segmentation algorithm generated several false-positive signals in highly compressed images, all true clusters were successfully segmented indicating that the compression process preserved the features of interest. Our preliminary results indicated that wavelets could be used to achieve high compression rates of mammographic images without losing small details such as microcalcification clusters as well as detect the calcifications from either the uncompressed or compressed reconstructed data. Further research and application of multiresolution analysis to digital mammography is continuing.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8172976     DOI: 10.1007/bf03168476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  7 in total

Review 1.  Breast imaging for the 1990s.

Authors:  L W Bassett; S Gambhir
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.929

2.  The automatic computer detection of subtle calcifications in radiographically dense breasts.

Authors:  D H Davies; D R Dance
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Tree-structured nonlinear filters in digital mammography.

Authors:  W Qian; L P Clarke; M Kallergi; R A Clark
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Performance analysis of reversible image compression techniques for high-resolution digital teleradiology.

Authors:  G R Kuduvalli; R M Rangayyan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Data compression: effect on diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography.

Authors:  H MacMahon; K Doi; S Sanada; S M Montner; M L Giger; C E Metz; N Nakamori; F F Yin; X W Xu; H Yonekawa
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Digital mammography. ROC studies of the effects of pixel size and unsharp-mask filtering on the detection of subtle microcalcifications.

Authors:  H P Chan; C J Vyborny; H MacMahon; C E Metz; K Doi; E A Sickles
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  Tree-structured non-linear filter and wavelet transform for microcalcification segmentation in digital mammography.

Authors:  L P Clarke; M Kallergi; W Qian; H D Li; R A Clark; M L Silbiger
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  1994-03-15       Impact factor: 8.679

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  Visually lossless threshold determination for microcalcification detection in wavelet compressed mammograms.

Authors:  O Kocsis; L Costaridou; L Varaki; E Likaki; C Kalogeropoulou; S Skiadopoulos; G Panayiotakis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  A multisite telemammography system for remote management of screening mammography: an assessment of technical, operational, and clinical issues.

Authors:  Joseph K Leader; Christiane M Hakim; Marie A Ganott; Denise M Chough; Luisa P Wallace; Ronald J Clearfield; Ronald L Perrin; John M Drescher; Glenn S Maitz; Jules H Sumkin; David Gur
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Automated Bayesian model development for frequency detection in biological time series.

Authors:  Emma Granqvist; Giles E D Oldroyd; Richard J Morris
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2011-06-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.