Literature DB >> 8170979

Discrimination of odortypes determined by the major histocompatibility complex among outbred mice.

K Yamazaki1, G K Beauchamp, F W Shen, J Bard, E A Boyse.   

Abstract

Genetically determined body odors that distinguish one mouse from another are termed odortypes. The best known odortypes, highly expressed in urine, are those specified by H-2, the major histocompatibility complex of the mouse, but other odortypes originate from unidentified loci in the rest of the genome, including both sex chromosomes. The definition of H-2 odortypes and evidence that their perception affects reproductive behavior have so far depended on studies with inbred mouse strains whose genetic differences are confined to the H-2 complex of genes. To simulate feral conditions more closely, a freely segregating population was bred from crosses involving four unrelated inbred strains contributing four different H-2 haplotypes. After H-2 typing, this outbred population was divided into four groups of freely segregating mice, comprising the four distinct H-2 genotypes represented, to serve as conventional donors of urine for evaluation in the standard Y-maze system used in the training and testing of mice for H-2 odortype discrimination. With respect to utility in training mice for H-2 odortype discrimination, and to degrees of concordance attained in the Y-maze by trained mice, these urinary H-2 odortype sources from outbred mice were no less effective than urines customarily obtained for those purposes from nonsegregating inbred donors. We conclude that discrimination of H-2 odortypes is not appreciably affected or impaired by the usual concurrent segregation within the genome as a whole.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8170979      PMCID: PMC43656          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.91.9.3735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  10 in total

1.  Mating patterns in seminatural populations of mice influenced by MHC genotype.

Authors:  W K Potts; C J Manning; E K Wakeland
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Familial imprinting determines H-2 selective mating preferences.

Authors:  K Yamazaki; G K Beauchamp; D Kupniewski; J Bard; L Thomas; E A Boyse
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-06-03       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Recognition of H-2 types in relation to the blocking of pregnancy in mice.

Authors:  K Yamazaki; G K Beauchamp; C J Wysocki; J Bard; L Thomas; E A Boyse
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-07-08       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Sensory distinction between H-2b and H-2bm1 mutant mice.

Authors:  K Yamazaki; G K Beauchamp; I K Egorov; J Bard; L Thomas; E A Boyse
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Fetal H-2 odortypes are evident in the urine of pregnant female mice.

Authors:  G K Beauchamp; K Yamazaki; M Curran; J Bard; E A Boyse
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.846

6.  Chemosensory recognition of mouse major histocompatibility types by another species.

Authors:  G K Beauchamp; K Yamazaki; C J Wysocki; B M Slotnick; L Thomas; E A Boyse
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Chemosensory recognition of phenotypes determined by the Tla and H-2K regions of chromosome 17 of the mouse.

Authors:  K Yamazaki; G K Beauchamp; J Bard; L Thomas; E A Boyse
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Chemosensory identity of H-2 heterozygotes.

Authors:  K Yamazaki; G K Beauchamp; L Thomas; E A Boyse
Journal:  J Mol Cell Immunol       Date:  1984

9.  Distinctive urinary odors governed by the major histocompatibility locus of the mouse.

Authors:  M Yamaguchi; K Yamazaki; G K Beauchamp; J Bard; L Thomas; E A Boyse
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Control of mating preferences in mice by genes in the major histocompatibility complex.

Authors:  K Yamazaki; E A Boyse; V Miké; H T Thaler; B J Mathieson; J Abbott; J Boyse; Z A Zayas; L Thomas
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1976-11-02       Impact factor: 14.307

  10 in total
  12 in total

1.  Olfactory fingerprints for major histocompatibility complex-determined body odors.

Authors:  M L Schaefer; D A Young; D Restrepo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Individual odortypes: interaction of MHC and background genes.

Authors:  Alan Willse; Jae Kwak; Kunio Yamazaki; George Preti; Jon H Wahl; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 2.846

Review 3.  In search of the chemical basis for MHC odourtypes.

Authors:  Jae Kwak; Alan Willse; George Preti; Kunio Yamazaki; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Olfactory discrimination of aliphatic odorants at 1 ppm: too easy for CD-1 mice to show odor structure-activity relationships?

Authors:  Matthias Laska; Asa Rosandher; Sara Hommen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  MHC-genotype of progeny influenced by parental infection.

Authors:  T Rülicke; M Chapuisat; F R Homberger; E Macas; C Wedekind
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Olfactory discrimination ability of CD-1 mice for a large array of enantiomers.

Authors:  M Laska; G M Shepherd
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  "Electronic nose" detects major histocompatibility complex-dependent prerenal and postrenal odor components.

Authors:  S Montag; M Frank; H Ulmer; D Wernet; W Göpel; H G Rammensee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Volatile signals of the major histocompatibility complex in male mouse urine.

Authors:  A G Singer; G K Beauchamp; K Yamazaki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-03-18       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Body odour preferences in men and women: do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simply heterozygosity?

Authors:  C Wedekind; S Füri
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Genetically-based olfactory signatures persist despite dietary variation.

Authors:  Jae Kwak; Alan Willse; Koichi Matsumura; Maryanne Curran Opiekun; Weiguang Yi; George Preti; Kunio Yamazaki; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.