Literature DB >> 8168410

Does the level of stapled ileoanal anastomosis influence physiologic and functional outcome?

R Annibali1, T Oresland, L Hultén.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this investigation was to ascertain how the length of anal canal preserved above the dentate line in stapled end-to-end ileoanal anastomosis influenced late outcome.
METHODS: Two groups, high cuff group and low cuff group of nine subjects with stapled anastomosis, matched for sex, age, pouch configuration, and mean follow-up, representing the highest (median, 2.5 cm) and lowest (median, 0.7 cm) anal cuff lengths in our series, were selected. Physiologic and functional parameters were appraised preoperatively, at the time of ileostomy closure, and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after reestablishment of intestinal continuity.
RESULTS: At one year, the drop in mean anal canal resting pressure was 13 percent in the high cuff group (not significant) and 31 percent in the low cuff group (P < 0.05); mean maximum squeezing pressure did not differ significantly from preoperative values in both groups. The mean volume of the ileal pouch was higher in the low cuff group at all insufflation pressures. The rectoanal inhibition reflex reappeared in four high cuff group patients and in none of the low cuff group patients. Mean distention pressure (cm H2O) and volume (ml) eliciting urge sensation were 80 and 360 in the low cuff group compared with 40 and 240 in the high cuff group (P < or = 0.05). Daytime bowel movements and night incontinence were significantly better in the low cuff group. No statistical differences were observed for night stool frequency, daytime incontinence, pad use (day and night), discrimination between gas and feces, ability to defer evacuation, and difficulty in emptying the pouch.
CONCLUSION: Patients with stapled anastomoses and a low rectal cuff length, despite presenting lower anal resting pressure and absence of rectoanal inhibition reflex, had a better functional outcome in terms of continence than those with a high cuff length.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8168410     DOI: 10.1007/bf02053591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  5 in total

1.  A comparison of hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) following proctocolectomy: a meta-analysis of 4183 patients.

Authors:  Richard E Lovegrove; Vasilis A Constantinides; Alexander G Heriot; Thanos Athanasiou; Ara Darzi; Feza H Remzi; R John Nicholls; Victor W Fazio; Paris P Tekkis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  MRI defecography of the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis-contributes little to the understanding of functional outcome.

Authors:  M L Sunde; A Negård; T Øresland; N Bakka; J T Geitung; A E Færden
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with resection of the anal transition zone.

Authors:  J Braun; K H Treutner; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Single plus one-port robotic surgery using the da Vinci Single-Site Platform versus conventional multi-port laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colon cancer.

Authors:  Sung Uk Bae; Woon Kyung Jegon; Seong Kyu Baek
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 1.195

5.  Postoperative changes of manometry after restorative proctocolectomy in Korean ulcerative colitis patients.

Authors:  Se Heon Oh; Yong Sik Yoon; Jong Lyul Lee; Chan Wook Kim; In Ja Park; Seok-Byung Lim; Chang Sik Yu; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.