Literature DB >> 7561431

Stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with resection of the anal transition zone.

J Braun1, K H Treutner, V Schumpelick.   

Abstract

We assessed the outcome of stapled ileal J-pouch-anal anastomosis with intersphincteric resection of the anal transition zone in 83 consecutive patients with ulcerative colitis (n = 71) or familial adenomatous polyposis (n = 12). There was no postoperative mortality. Two patients (2.4%) required permanent ileostomy for manifestation of unsuspected Crohn's disease. Major postoperative complications consisted of pelvic sepsis, anastomotic leakage, and pancreatitis with 3.6% each. Both, frequency of bowel movements and degree of continence improved with time. Two years after takedown of the diverting ileostomy 45 patients with ulcerative colitis and 12 with familial adenomatous polyposis were assessed with a frequency of bowel movements of 5.6 +/- 2 and 3.2 +/- 1 per 24 h, respectively (P < 0.05). At this time none of them had major daytime or nighttime incontinence. Minor incontinence was reported by 9% and 14% of the patients with ulcerative colitis during day-time and night-time, respectively. The patients with familial adenomatous polyposis demonstrated better results, without day-time seepage and intermittent nocturnal seepage in only 9%. It is concluded that direct ileal J-pouch-anal anastomosis is a safe procedure with excellent functional results for patients with ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7561431     DOI: 10.1007/BF00298536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  36 in total

1.  Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Patterns of failure.

Authors:  B T Gemlo; W D Wong; D A Rothenberger; S M Goldberg
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1992-07

2.  Prospective randomized trial comparing anal function after hand sewn ileoanal anastomosis with mucosectomy versus stapled ileoanal anastomosis without mucosectomy in restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  S Choen; A Tsunoda; R J Nicholls
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Internal anal sphincter function after total abdominal colectomy and stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis without mucosal proctectomy.

Authors:  I C Lavery; W B Tuckson; K A Easley
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  The S ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  C A Vasilevsky; D A Rothenberger; S M Goldberg
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Internal anal sphincter activity after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: a study using continuous ambulatory manometry.

Authors:  P J Holdsworth; P M Sagar; W G Lewis; M Williamson; D Johnston
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Stapled vs hand-sutured ileoanal anastomosis in restorative proctocolectomy. A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  P Luukkonen; H Järvinen
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1993-04

7.  Restorative proctocolectomy in patients after previous intestinal or anal surgery.

Authors:  M C Parker; R J Nicholls
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Totally stapled abdominal restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  W A Kmiot; M R Keighley
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Stricture at the pouch-anal anastomosis after restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  W G Lewis; A Kuzu; P M Sagar; P J Holdsworth; D Johnston
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir and anal anastomosis.

Authors:  A G Parks; R J Nicholls; P Belliveau
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  3 in total

1.  Stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with resection of the anal transition zone.

Authors:  M Thompson-Fawcett; B Warren; N Mortensen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Functional outcome after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis compared with proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  P van Duijvendijk; J F Slors; C W Taat; P Oosterveld; H F Vasen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Does mesorectal preservation protect the ileoanal anastomosis after restorative proctocolectomy?

Authors:  Andreas D Rink; Irina Radinski; Karl-Heinz Vestweber
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 3.452

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.