Literature DB >> 816698

Study of the pattern of Widal test in infants and children; II. Pattern of Widal test in children with enteric fevers. An attempt to define the diagnostic titer for upper Egypt.

F Hassanein, F M Mostafa, F Elbehairy, H M Hammam, F A Allam, M El-Rehaiwy, A Abdel-Aziz.   

Abstract

The study embodied 45 children with enteric fevers proved by bacteriological culture of blood, stools and urine and 20 children with rheumatic fever. Widal test was done for the rheumatic fever cases and was done repeatedly at weekly intervals for the enteric fever cases. The clinical features of children with enteric fevers was discussed. By contrasting the results of Widal test in children with enteric fever with the results in apparently normal infants and children from the same locality, a minimal diagnostic dual Widal titer was suggested. This combines "O" agglutinin in a titer of 1/160 provided that the other "H" agglutinins are at a lower titer. This suggested diagnostic titer improved the specificity of Widal test. This titer is encountered only in 0.58% of normal individuals and in none of 20 children with rheumatic fever. This titer also yielded an excellent sensitivity to diagnose actual enteric fever cases reaching up to 93.3%. Bacterial isolates from enteric fever cases were S. typhi in 55.5%, S. paratyphi A in 33.3% and S. paratyphi B in 11.1%. Chloramphenicol therapy resulted in a higher cure rate and a more rapid defervescence than ampicillin therapy. Regarding the effect of these antibiotic therapies on the rise of Widal agglutinin titers in children with enteric fevers there are two observations : 1--A four fold rise, is uncommon. A two fold rise is the common finding. 2--There is no consistent difference between chloramphenicol and ampicillin as regards their effect on the rise of agglutinin titers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 816698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gaz Egypt Paediatr Assoc        ISSN: 1110-6638


  2 in total

1.  The dilemma of widal test - which brand to use? a study of four different widal brands: a cross sectional comparative study.

Authors:  Wafaa M K Bakr; Laila A El Attar; Medhat S Ashour; Ayman M El Toukhy
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 3.944

2.  A Meta-Analysis of Typhoid Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: A Recommendation to Adopt a Standardized Composite Reference.

Authors:  Helen L Storey; Ying Huang; Chris Crudder; Allison Golden; Tala de los Santos; Kenneth Hawkins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.