Literature DB >> 8166843

Effects of hypnosis on regional cerebral blood flow during ischemic pain with and without suggested hypnotic analgesia.

H J Crawford1, R C Gur, B Skolnick, R E Gur, D M Benson.   

Abstract

Using 133Xe regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) imaging, two male groups having high and low hypnotic susceptibility were compared in waking and after hypnotic induction, while at rest and while experiencing ischemic pain to both arms under two conditions: attend to pain and suggested analgesia. Differences between low and highly-hypnotizable persons were observed during all hypnosis conditions: only highly-hypnotizable persons showed a significant increase in overall CBF, suggesting that hypnosis requires cognitive effort. As anticipated, ischemic pain produced CBF increases in the somatosensory region. Of major theoretical interest is a highly-significant bilateral CBF activation of the orbito-frontal cortex in the highly-hypnotizable group only during hypnotic analgesia. During hypnotic analgesia, highly-hypnotizable persons showed CBF increase over the somatosensory cortex, while low-hypnotizable persons showed decreases. Research is supportive of a neuropsychophysiological model of hypnosis (Crawford, 1991; Crawford and Gruzelier, 1992) and suggests that hypnotic analgesia involves the supervisory, attentional control system of the far-frontal cortex in a topographically specific inhibitory feedback circuit that cooperates in the regulation of thalamocortical activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8166843     DOI: 10.1016/0167-8760(93)90002-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  7 in total

1.  Mechanisms of hypnosis: toward the development of a biopsychosocial model.

Authors:  Mark P Jensen; Tomonori Adachi; Catarina Tomé-Pires; Jikwan Lee; Zubaidah Jamil Osman; Jordi Miró
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Hypn       Date:  2015

Review 2.  Pain perception: is there a role for primary somatosensory cortex?

Authors:  M C Bushnell; G H Duncan; R K Hofbauer; B Ha; J I Chen; B Carrier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Hypnosis in the right hemisphere.

Authors:  John F Kihlstrom; Martha L Glisky; Susan McGovern; Steven Z Rapcsak; Mark S Mennemeier
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Top-down and bottom-up mechanisms in mind-body medicine: development of an integrative framework for psychophysiological research.

Authors:  Ann Gill Taylor; Lisa E Goehler; Daniel I Galper; Kim E Innes; Cheryl Bourguignon
Journal:  Explore (NY)       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.775

Review 5.  Neuro-hypnotism: prospects for hypnosis and neuroscience.

Authors:  John F Kihlstrom
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  New directions in hypnosis research: strategies for advancing the cognitive and clinical neuroscience of hypnosis.

Authors:  Mark P Jensen; Graham A Jamieson; Antoine Lutz; Giuliana Mazzoni; William J McGeown; Enrica L Santarcangelo; Athena Demertzi; Vilfredo De Pascalis; Éva I Bányai; Christian Rominger; Patrik Vuilleumier; Marie-Elisabeth Faymonville; Devin B Terhune
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2017-04-12

7.  The effect of hypnosis on pain and peripheral blood flow in sickle-cell disease: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ravi R Bhatt; Sarah R Martin; Subhadra Evans; Kirsten Lung; Thomas D Coates; Lonnie K Zeltzer; Jennie C Tsao
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.133

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.