Literature DB >> 22705266

Hypnosis in the right hemisphere.

John F Kihlstrom1, Martha L Glisky, Susan McGovern, Steven Z Rapcsak, Mark S Mennemeier.   

Abstract

Speculations about the neural substrates of hypnosis have often focused on the right hemisphere (RH), implying that RH damage should impair hypnotic responsiveness more than left-hemisphere (LH) damage. The present study examined the performance of a patient who suffered a stroke destroying most of his LH, on slightly modified versions of two hypnotizability scales. This patient was at least modestly hypnotizable, as indicated in particular by the arm rigidity and age regression items, suggesting that hypnosis can be mediated by the RH alone - provided that the language capacities normally found in the LH remain available. A further study of 16 patients with unilateral strokes of the LH or RH found no substantial differences in hypnotizability between the two groups. Future neuropsychological studies of hypnosis might explore the dorsal/ventral or anterior/posterior dichotomies, with special emphasis on the role of prefrontal cortex.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22705266      PMCID: PMC3502707          DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.04.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  43 in total

1.  Laterality of hypnotic response.

Authors:  L L Otto-Salaj; R Nadon; I P Hoyt; P A Register; J F Kihlstrom
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Hypn       Date:  1992-01

2.  Writing with the right hemisphere.

Authors:  S Z Rapcsak; P M Beeson; A B Rubens
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Left hemisphere superiority for event-related potential effects of hypnotic obstruction.

Authors:  P Jasiukaitis; B Nouriani; D Spiegel
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Enhanced hypnotizability by cerebrally applied magnetic fields depends upon the order of hemispheric presentation: an anistropic effect.

Authors:  S G Tiller; M A Persinger
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.292

Review 5.  Neuropsychological evidence of reductions on left frontal tests with hypnosis.

Authors:  J Gruzelier; K Warren
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 7.723

6.  Hierarchical stimuli and hemispheric specialization: two case studies.

Authors:  M R Polster; S Z Rapcsak
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Enhanced hypnotic suggestibility following application of burst-firing magnetic fields over the right temporoparietal lobes: a replication.

Authors:  F Healey; M A Persinger; S A Koren
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.292

8.  Praxis and the right hemisphere.

Authors:  S Z Rapcsak; C Ochipa; P M Beeson; A B Rubens
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Effects of hypnosis on regional cerebral blood flow during ischemic pain with and without suggested hypnotic analgesia.

Authors:  H J Crawford; R C Gur; B Skolnick; R E Gur; D M Benson
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.997

10.  EEG concomitants of hypnosis and hypnotic susceptibility.

Authors:  N F Graffin; W J Ray; R Lundy
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1995-02
View more
  3 in total

1.  Mechanisms of hypnosis: toward the development of a biopsychosocial model.

Authors:  Mark P Jensen; Tomonori Adachi; Catarina Tomé-Pires; Jikwan Lee; Zubaidah Jamil Osman; Jordi Miró
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Hypn       Date:  2015

Review 2.  Hypnotic suggestion: opportunities for cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  David A Oakley; Peter W Halligan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 3.  Neuro-hypnotism: prospects for hypnosis and neuroscience.

Authors:  John F Kihlstrom
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 4.027

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.