Literature DB >> 8162683

Percutaneous internal ureteral stent placement: review of technical issues and solutions in 50 consecutive cases.

D S Lu1, N Papanicolaou, M Girard, M J Lee, I C Yoder.   

Abstract

Fifty consecutive percutaneous ureteral stent placements in 40 patients over 2 1/2 years were reviewed. Thirty-seven of 50 cases were performed following failed retrograde stenting. Antegrade stenting failed in 2/37 (5%) cases of malignant obstruction, and 4/13 (31%) cases of benign ureteral disease. Causes of failure and common technical problems included poor angulation of the percutaneous track, tortuous dilated ureters, tight obstructions, wedging of stent assembly components due to high resistance, and difficulty in positioning of the proximal pigtail. Helpful technical modifications included mid-pole rather than lower pole calyceal access, urinary decompression prior to stenting, and the routine use of a peel-away sheath (success rate 23/24 placements with sheath vs 21/26 without sheath). Stent patency rates were 95% at 3 months and 54% at 6 months. With attention to technique and appropriate modifications, success rate of percutaneous stenting remained high in this series despite the large number of cases referred after retrograde stenting had failed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8162683     DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)81852-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  6 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous nephrostomy and antegrade ureteral stenting: technique-indications-complications.

Authors:  Klaus Armin Hausegger; Horst Rupert Portugaller
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-18       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Antegrade Ureteral Stenting is a Good Alternative for the Retrograde Approach.

Authors:  Rutger W van der Meer; Saskia Weltings; Arian R van Erkel; Hossain Roshani; Henk W Elzevier; Lukas C van Dijk; Hans van Overhagen
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2017-05-30

3.  Comparison of single and tandem ureteral stenting for malignant ureteral obstruction: a prospective study of 104 patients.

Authors:  Kao-Lang Liu; Bo-Ching Lee; Jian-De Ye; Yu-Hsuan Chang; Chin-Chen Chang; Kuo-How Huang; Yuan-Ju Lee; Yeun-Chung Chang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Antegrade double-J stent placement for the treatment of malignant obstructive uropathy: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ghassen Tlili; Houssem Ammar; Sonia Dziri; Khaled Ben Ahmed; Waad Farhat; Sofiene Arem; Emir Acacha; Rahul Gupta; Arib Rguez; Mehdi Jaidane
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-08-16

Review 5.  Image-guided urological interventions: What the urologists must know.

Authors:  Chandan J Das; Vinit Baliyan; Sanjay Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

6.  Evaluation of Galdakao-modified Valdivia position in endoscopic management of malignant ureteric obstruction.

Authors:  Ahmed Emam; Mohamed Elmoazen; Mohamed Shabayek; Amr M Zriek; Hany Hamed Gad
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.370

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.